Work intensity: updating approaches to the assessment of psychosocial factors in occupational health

The article analyzes the problems associated with assessing the intensity of the labor process in modern conditions. The authors consider the evolution of the structure and content of work, noting the increasing role of psychosocial factors due to new forms of work organization, the intensity of information loads and the introduction of digital management and control tools.

It is emphasized that traditional hygienic approaches developed for other technological conditions may not fully take into account modern cognitive and emotional stresses. In this regard, the issue of updating the methodological framework for assessing working conditions is being considered.

Based on these studies, the relationship between the characteristics of the working environment and the state of the psycho-emotional health of employees is shown.

The researchers are discussing the possibilities of developing a system for assessing psychosocial risks, including the use of standardized survey tools such as the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ).

The article substantiates the expediency of forming a unified methodology for assessing the psychosocial factors of the working environment, integrated into the occupational safety and health management system, which will contribute to the preservation of workers' health.

Ethics. The article is a discussion paper based on an analysis of regulatory documents, scientific literature, and open data. Since the research did not involve working with people or personal data, no special ethical approval was required.

Contributions:
Novikova A.V. — concept and design of research, collection and processing of material, writing text;
Shirokov V.A. — concept and design of research, collection and processing of material, writing, editing.

Funding. The work was carried out within the Framework of the state assignment: Reg. EGISU R&D No.: 124030700017-5.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received: 29.04.2026 / Accepted: 15.05.2026 / Published: 11.09.2026

1. Kalinina S.A. Socio-psychological factors of occupational stress formation under neuro-emotional loads. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2009; (5): 18–22 (in Russian).

2. Kalinina S.A., Yushkova O.I. The influence of socio-psychological factors on the formation of occupational stress. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2015; 41(4): 44. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0131164615030078 (in Russian).

3. Yudina M.A. Digital labour control — challenge of modern time. State Administration. Ehlektronnyj vestnik. 2022; (92): 42–56. https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2022-92-42-56 (in Russian).

4. Zhang N., Sun X., Jin C. Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Employees' Job Performance: A Social Information Processing Perspective. Behav. Sci. (Basel). 2025; 15(3): 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030256

5. Chigisova A.N., Ogarkov M.Yu., Scripcenco A.E. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders among workers of metallurgical enterprises with arterial hypertension. Vestnik sovremennoj klinicheskoj meditsiny. 2016; 9(1): 75–79/ https://doi.org/10.20969/vskm.2016.9(1).75-79 (in Russian).

6. Kutenkikh E.V., Tsoi I.V., Kononenko T.V., Gonokhova L.G. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in workers of railway transport enterprises in the Russian Far East. Dal'nevostochnyj meditsinskij zhurnal. 2019; (2): 65–70. https://elibrary.ru/yvysdp (in Russian).

7. Kuzmina S.V., Garipova R.V., Berhkeeva Z.M., Yakhin K.K. Mental health of chemical workers: violation risk factors. Kazan Medical Journal. 2020; 101(4): 550–560. https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2020-550 (in Russian).

8. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I., Zhovnerchuk E.V., Serikov V.V., Khatin D.E., Moskovenko A.V. Work-related mental health: current state of the art (literature review). Gigiena i Sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation]. 2021; 100(11): 1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-11-1236-1243 (in Russian).

9. Theorell T., Hammarström A., Aronsson G. et al. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 738. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4

10. Duchaine C.S., Aubé K., Gilbert-Ouimet M. et al. Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of depression: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(11): e033093. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033093

11. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Yushkova O.I., Afanasyeva Yu.F. Hygienic assessment of working conditions at workplaces of specialists with high computer load and justification of prevention measures. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2024; 64(6): 420–427. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2024-64-6-420-427 (in Russian).

12. Glukhov D.V., Yushkova O.I., Kapustina A.V. Assessment of psychophysiological state of administrative workers and health risks. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2023; 63(3): 193–199. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-3-193-199 (in Russian).

13. Serikov V.V., Yushkova O.I., Kapustina A.V. Substantiation of criteria for evaluating the intensity of the labor process in workers of modern types of work. In: Health and Environment: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 95th anniversary of the Republican Unitary Enterprise "Scientific and Practical Center of Hygiene". Minsk, November 24–25, 2022. Minsk: Publishing Center of BSU, 2022: 311-313. https://elibrary.ru/stuicn (in Russian).

14. Burr H., Berthelsen H., Moncada S., et al. The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Safety and Health at Work. 2019; 10(4): 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002

15. Lincke H.J., Vomstein M., Lindner A., et al. COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2021; 16: 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1

16. Novikova A.V., Perevezentseva A.S., Shirokov V.A. Development of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire COPSOQ III and its adaptation in various occupational groups. Gigiena i Sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation]. 2024; 103(2): 130–135. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-2-130-135 (in Russian).

17. Novikova A. COPSOQ RU Validation [Data set]. Mendeley Data, V1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17632/gzpgnj49tf.1 (accessed 25.01.2026)

18. Novikova A.V., Shirokov V.A., Kuzmin S.V., Novikov A.A., Perevezentseva A.S. Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2026: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2026.2649753

19. Bukhtiyarov I.V., et al. Physiological criteria for improving labor intensity classification used in occupational risks assessment. Health Risk Analysis. 2021; (1): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.1.09 (in Russian).