Analysis of NIOSH (USA) materials on research priorities for industrial robots and comments on it
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-1-4-11
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health of the USA (NIOSH), which belongs to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), created the Center for the Study of Professional Robotics (CORR) and requests information to determine the priority areas of research. These are gaps in knowledge on the safety and health of people working with industrial robotics, with a focus on the field of occupational safety and health, which are unlikely to be conducted by other federal agencies, academia, or the private sector. The request was signed by NIOSH Director John J. Howard, CORR’s curator is Hongwei Xiao, Ph.D.; CORR funding is provided for by the NIOSH strategic work plan for 2019–2023. Below besides to the directions of CORR comments, the main information hygiene (IG) developments published in Russia are outlined. The role of sanitary inspection is also noted, along with standardization and regulation by competent authorities: the WHO / ILO Joint Committee on Occupational Health, ISO, IEC, etc. The Technical Committee of Rosstandart TC–194 “CyberPhysical Systems” was established in Russia, which began with terminology. The article presents a brief translation of the CORR request with our comments and some domestic literature on IG, thus reflecting two mainstreams of occupational safety and health robotics.
Funding. The study had no funding.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
About the Authors
I. V. BukhtiyarovRussian Federation
Igor V. Bukhtiyarov, MD, Prof., RA S corr. member, Director
E. I. Denisov
Russian Federation
References
1. Endsley M., Jones D. Designing situational awareness: an approach to user-centered design. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. 2013.
2. Robotics Virtual Organization. A roadmap for U.S. Robotics: from internet to robotics (2016 Edition). https://robotics-vo.us node/562.
3. Murashov V., Hearl F., Howard J. Working safety with robot worker: recommendations for the new workplace. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016; 13(3): 61-71.
4. International Federation of Robotics (IFR. Executive summary world robotics 2017 industrial robots. https://ifr.org/downloads/press/Executive_Summary_WR_2017_Industrial_ Robots.pdf.
5. Kostenko N.A. Working conditions and occupational morbidity in some types of economic activities of the Russian Federation in 2004-2013 Occupational medicine and industrial ecology. 2015; 4: 40-4 (in Russian).
6. Occupational pathology: national guide. ed. N.F. Izmerov. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. ISBN 978-5-9704-1947-2. (in Russian).
7. Occupational Health Risk for Employees (Manual). Eds. N.F. Izmerov and E.I. Denisov. M.: Treovant, 2003. 448 pp. (in Russian).
8. Izmerov N.F, Denisov E.I. Occupational risk assessment in occupational medicine: principles, methods and criteria. Bulletin of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2004; 2:17-21. (in Russian).
9. WHO. Mental health in the workplace. Information sheet. 2017 http://www.who.int/mental_health/in_the_workplace/en.
10. Eurofound. Burnout in the workplace: A review of data and policy responses in the EU, Publications Offi ce of the European Union, Luxembourg; 2018.
11. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I., Yeremin A.L. Fundamentals of information hygiene: concepts and problems of innovation. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2014; 4: 5-9 (in Russian).
12. Denisov E.I., Prokopenko L.V., Eremin A.L., Kurierov N.N., Bodyakin V.I., Stepanyan I.V. Information as a physical factor: the problems of measurement, hygienic evaluation and IT automation. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2014; 1: 36-43 (in Russian).
13. Stepanyan I.V., Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L., Bodyakin V.I., Saveliev A.V. Algorithms for optimizing intellectual labor by visualizing information using cognitive semantic graphics. Nejrokomp’yutery: razrabotka, primenenie. 2014; 7: 53-9 (in Russian).
14. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I., Lagutina G.N., Pfaf V.F., Chesalin P.V., Stepanyan I.V. Sriteria and algorithms of workrelatedness assessment of workers’ health disorders. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2018; 8: 4-12. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428- 2018-8-4-12/ (in Russian).
15. Ergonomic guidelines for user-interface design. Available at: http://ergo.human.cornell.edu/AHTutorials/interface.html
16. Stepanyan I.V. Ergonomic qualities of graphic user interfaces (GUI): state and evolution. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2018; 12: 51-6. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-12-51-57 (in Russian).
17. Wilpert B. (2007). Psychology and design processes. Safety Science, 45, 293-303.
18. Reinert D., Brun E., Flaspöler E. Complex machinery needs simple explanation. Safety Science. 2007; 45: 579-89.
19. Waters, R.M.: Use of standards to reduce human error. Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis, ASME, Proceedings of the 1994. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov 6-11, 1994; Chicago, IL. 1994; 2: 161-6.
20. Döös, M., Backström, T. & Sundström-Frisk, C.: Human actions and errors in risk handling - an empirically grounded discussion of cognitive action-regulation levels. Safety Science. 2004. 42: 185-204.
21. Nachreiner, F., Nickel P and Meyer I. (2006). Human factors in process control systems: The design of human - machine interfaces. Safety Science. 2006; 44: 5-26.
22. Einarsson S., Human error in high hazard systems: Do we treat the problem in an appropriate way? Journal of Risk Research. 1999; 2 (2): 115-28.
23. Th e human machine interface as an emerging risk. Topic Centre Risk Observatory: E. Flaspöler, A. Hauke, P. Pappachan, D. Reinert et al. https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/literature_reviews/HMI_emerging_risk/view.
24. Nikitin A. Diseases of workers with the indication of protective measures described by the doctor of medicine Alexander Nikitin. St. Petersburg: Edward Prats Printing House, 1847. 249 pp.
25. Denisov E.I. Robots, artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality: ethical, legal and hygienic issues. Gigiena i sanitaria. 2019; 98(1): 32-37 (in Russian).
26. Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L., Sivochalova O.V. Information hygiene and regulation of information for vulnerable populations. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2014; 5: 43-9 (in Russian).
27. Kuchma, V.R., Tkachuk, E. A., Tarmaeva, I.Yu. Psychophysiological state of children in the conditions of informatization of their vital activity and intensification of education. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2016; 95.12: 1183-8 (in Russian).
28. Occupational medicine and industrial ecology. ACOEM guidance statement. Workplace Health Protection and Promotion - A New Pathway for a Healthier-and Safer- Workforce. JOEM. 2011; (53)6: 695-702/ https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM. 0b013e31822005d0/281.
29. Eremin A.L. Information ecology and human health in modern conditions. Gigiena i sanitariya. 1998; 5: 58-60 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I. Analysis of NIOSH (USA) materials on research priorities for industrial robots and comments on it. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2020;(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-1-4-11
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)