Preview

Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology

Advanced search

Nutrition quality assessment on industrial enterprises with various service types

https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-11-51-55

Abstract

Dietary intake (2 week menu) was evaluated on 4 metallurgic enterprises, with assessment of eating habits and anthropometry in 370 workers, using automated informational system “Calculation system for catering”. The eating habits were assessed through the authors’ questionnaire. According to the study results, the canteens which are units within industrial enterprises are socially oriented, demonstrate higher motivation in service quality, service schedule more corresponding to diet scheme of various shift workers, more variability of dishes, if compared to the canteens working on outsourcing agreements. The canteens working on outsourcing agreements are interested more in profits — that causes more disturbances, lower food quality and discontentment from the workers. Control over the menu formation on the enterprises is poor. Complex meals for therapeutic prophylactic diet, formed without consideration of nutritive value, appeared to have low protein and high fat contents.

About the Authors

Tatyana V. Mazhayeva
Ekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers
Russian Federation
30, Popova Str., Ekaterinburg, 620014


Svetlana E. Dubenko
Ekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers
Russian Federation
30, Popova Str., Ekaterinburg, 620014


Eduard G. Plotko
Ekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers
Russian Federation
30, Popova Str., Ekaterinburg, 620014


References

1. Sorokin G.A. Health markers dynamics with age and within a working tenure as a criterion for occupational and non-occupational risks comparison. Gigiyena i san. 2016; 4: 355–61 (in Russian).

2. Mogil’nyj M.P., Tutel’yan V.A. Nutrition habits of working population. Voprosy pitaniya. 2014; 83 (S3): 29 (in Russian).

3. Belyayeva Yu.S., Shipilov I.V., Voronin V.N. Assessing dynamics of indicators of nutrition-dependent risk factors for noncommunicable diseases in workers of a coal company in Kuzbass. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2017; 9: 24 (in Russian).

4. Using price policies to promote healthier diets. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015.

5. Aranceta J., Pérez-Rodrigo C. Recommended dietary reference intakes, nutritional goals and dietary guidelines for fat and fatty acids: a systematic review. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012; 107: 8–22. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114512001444.

6. Moughan P.J., Gilani, S., Rutherfurd S.M., Tome, D. True ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients for application in the calculation of digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) in human nutrition: Report of a Sub-Committee of the 2011 FAO Consultation on “Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition. New Zealand; 2012: 58.

7. Liu R.H. Health benef ts of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. The American j. clinical nutrition. 2003; 78 (3): 517–20.

8. Bouvard V.., Loomis D.., Guyton K.Z., Grosse Y., Ghissassi F.E. et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncology. 2015; 16 (16): 1599.

9. Bella F., Godos J., Ippolito A., Di Prima A., Sciacca S. et al. Differences in the association between empirically derived dietary patterns and cancer: a meta-analysis. Intern. J. Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2017; 68(4): 402–10. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2016.1261087.

10. Hooper L., Abdelhamid A., Moore H.J., Douthwaite W., Skeaff C.M. et al. Effect of reducing total fat intake on body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. British Medical J. 2012; 345: 1–15. doi: 10.1136/bmj.


Review

For citations:


Mazhayeva T.V., Dubenko S.E., Plotko E.G. Nutrition quality assessment on industrial enterprises with various service types. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2018;(11):51-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-11-51-55

Views: 503


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1026-9428 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)