The importance of psychophysiological factors in the development of fatigue in digital technology workers
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2026-66-3-148-158
EDN: lshbqi
Abstract
Introduction. The introduction of digital technologies and computerization of workplaces in all spheres of activity leads to an increasing intensification of work and the prevalence of the impact of a complex of psychophysiological factors on employees, which leads to increased risks of fatigue, the development of work-related diseases (hypertension, psychosomatic disorders), occupational stress and occupational injuries.
The study aims to identify the prevalence of psychophysiological factors and their influence on the appearance of signs of fatigue and deterioration of health in workers engaged in the field of digital technologies.
Materials and methods. The authors have conducted online survey of employees of three professional groups — "programmers", "operators" and "librarians", differing in the level of work intensity (a total of 1,190 respondents). The main focus group was programmers. To compare professional groups with each other, the method of cumulative scoring of respondents' answers to each of the questions was used. The researchers have analyzed the results of a special assessment of working conditions according to the Federal State Social Insurance Service at enterprises of the Russian Federation, as well as data from SAWC cards at computerized workplaces posted on the official websites of IT industry organizations. The researchers analyzed 18 summary reports (7568 employees, of which 4267 were IT specialists). Statistical processing included calculations of averages, errors of averages, tests, comparisons of frequencies of quantitative and categorical indicators, Fisher's exact test, chi-square criterion, Spearman correlation coefficient, assessment of relative risk (RR) and etiological proportion (EF, %).
Results. An analysis of the survey data showed that work intensity (WI) (mental and intellectual stress) is the leading factor in the working conditions of programmers — 29.0% of respondents noted the presence of work tension, noise was noted by 24.7% of respondents, elevated air temperature — 16.9%, insufficient illumination — 12.6%. In the work of operators, the assessment of the presence of a labor stress factor (nervous and emotional stress) was 2.5 times higher — 71.4%, while noise was the leading factor — 82.4%. Librarians' work intensity is also in 2nd place — 20.8% — after the "dustiness" factor — 36.4%. According to the criteria of the total labor intensity score, operators are in the first place (830.2 points), programmers are in the second (530.3 points), librarians are in the third (482.6 points). The frequency of the severity factor was highest in the work of operators — 17.6%, in the other two groups — 7–8 times lower.
However, when assessing signs of psychological and physical well-being, programmers had the worst indicators. The prevalence of the indicators "decreased ability to concentrate" was 45.5%, 37.4% and 34.1% (p<0.05), "slow reaction speed" — 29.4%, 29.1% and 17.4% among programmers, operators and librarians, respectively. The total score for all these criteria was: programmers — 422.8 points, operators — 325.8 points, librarians — 294.9 points.
Significant correlation coefficients (rs) have been established between all signs of psychological and physical well-being disorders and labor intensity indicators (from 0.43 to 0.67 in the three groups), which indicates a significant contribution of labor intensity to the studied indicators in the group of programmers.
Limitations. The study had certain limitations due to the specifics of the survey based on the subjective opinion of the respondents.
Conclusion. The results obtained indicate a more pronounced deterioration in cognitive functions by the end of the work shift, as well as a higher incidence of signs of chronic fatigue and health problems among programmers, relative to the comparison groups. The features of cognitive impairment and chronic fatigue among programmers, the frequency of which in the course of the study was 51.1%, fit into the picture of "digital fatigue", a syndrome that WHO called a "professional phenomenon" in the modern world, most characteristic of IT workers. This requires improving hygienic approaches to assessing intellectual workloads, including for programmers, which are currently not legally fixed, and therefore the level of work intensity in the workplace is underestimated.
Ethics. The study did not require the conclusion of the Ethics Committee, all data were presented in a depersonalized form.
Contributions:
Zibarev E.V. — concept, design and methodology of research, questionnaire development, editing;
Kravchenko O.K. — data processing, questionnaire development, text writing;
Mazhkenov S.A. — research concept and design, questionnaire development, data collection, text writing;
Nikonova S.M. — data processing, questionnaire development, text writing;
Mukhin K.S. — research concept and design, data collection, editing.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding. The study had no funding.
Received: 09.02.2026 / Accepted: 16.02.2026 / Published: 25.04.2026
About the Authors
Evgeny V. ZibarevRussian Federation
Deputy Director for Scientific Work (Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health); Professor of the Department of Hygiene at the Institute of Preventive Medicine (N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University), Dr. of Sci. (Med.)
e-mail: zibarev@irioh.ru
Serik A. Mazhkenov
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher (All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation), Cand. of Sci. (Phys.&Math.)
e-mail: SAMazhkenov@vcot.info
Olga K. Kravchenko
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher (Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health), Cand. of Sci. (Med.)
e-mail: olga.k.kravchenko@mail.ru
Sofia M. Nikonova
Russian Federation
Expert of All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Cand. of Sci. (Med.)
e-mail: sm_nikonova@vcot.info
Kirill S. Mukhin
Russian Federation
Technician (Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health)
e-mail: dfozmor@yandex.ru
References
1. Mazhkenov S.A. A new concept of occupational safety based on risk and process-oriented approaches. Russian Journal of Labour Economics. 2022; 9(9): 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.9.9.116308 https://elibrary.ru/zpmrxo (in Russian).
2. Kostenko N.A., Zibarev E.V., Borisova E.V., Mazhkenov S.A. The role of the human factor in railway accidents. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2025; 65(5): 316–325. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-5-316-325 https://elibrary.ru/wnimmm (in Russian).
3. Tebenova K.S., Musina A.A., Akhmetova N.Sh., Alshynbekova G.K. Subjective assessment of the impact of occupational risk factors on the health of employees working with video display terminals (based on a questionnaire survey). Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2013; 4: 146–150. https://elibrary.ru/qanvil (in Russian).
4. Zibarev E.V., Bukhtiyarov I.V., Valtseva E.A., Tokarev A.V. Assessment of labor intensity indicators and factors affecting fatigue in civil aviation pilots based on the results of a questionnaire. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2021; 61(6): 356–364. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-6-356-364 (in Russian).
5. Zibarev E.V., Vostrikova S.M., Kravchenko O.K., Bessonova A.K., Nikonova S.M. Self-Assessment of Exposure Levels to Harmful Occupational Factors at the Workplaces of Miners. Ehkologiya cheloveka. 2025; 32(7): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco685787 https://elibrary.ru/suptrd (in Russian).
6. von Känel R., van Nuffel M., Fuchs W.J. Risk assessment for job burnout with a mobile health web application using questionnaire data: A proof of concept study. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2016; 10: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-016-0082-4
7. Fomina E.E., Zhiganov N.K. Methods of processing the results of questionnaires using methods of multidimensional and parametric statistics. Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie nauki. 2017; 1: 106–115. https://elibrary.ru/ykjuzl (in Russian).
8. Pokhodzey L.V., Paltsev Yu.P., Rudneva E.A. Electromagnetic conditions hygienic assessment at workplaces with personal computers: history and present status. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2019; 11: 1196–1200. https://elibrary.ru/fdzsgp (in Russian).
9. Haggag A.A. Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Across Professions: A Comparative Study of Physicians, Engineers, and Teachers in Light of Demographic and Occupational Variables. Research Square, Version 1. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5040002/v1
10. Krasova E.V. The information technology and communication stressors impact on workers’ health. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology [Med. truda i prom. ekol.]. 2022; 9: 616–626. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2022-62-9-616-626 https://elibrary.ru/nnbgaz (in Russian).
11. Mukhtdinova A.R. The Influence of Labor Process Factors on the Functional State of IT Workers. In: "All-Russian scientific and practical conference 'Digital transformation in occupational medicine and industrial medicine (on the 85th anniversary of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences N.Kh. Amirov)'". Kazan; 2024: 88-92. https://doi.org/10.24412/cl-37262-2024-1-88-92 (in Russian).
12. Supriyadi, Tugimin & Sulistiasih, Sulistiasih & Rahmi, Kus & Pramono, Budi & Fahrudin, Adi. The impact of digital fatigue on employee productivity and well-being: A scoping literature review. Environment and Social Psychology. 2025; 10(2). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3420
13. Sytin Dmitry. Digital Fatigue: Why Work Services Hinder Focus and Reduce Productivity [Electronic resource] (accessed: May 6, 2025). https://clck.ru/3T5YsD (in Russian).
14. Muravyeva O.I., Kozlova K.V. Professional Burnout of Programmers: The Specificity of the Phenomenon. Sibirskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2019; 73: 98–110. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/73/6 (in Russian).
15. Izmerov N.F., Skvirskaya G.P. Working conditions as a risk factor for the development of diseases and mortality from cardiovascular pathology. Byulleten' Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossijskoj akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2005; 40(2): 14–20. https://elibrary.ru/kzzfuj (in Russian).
16. Nekrasova M.M. Influence of professional activity on the functional state of the cardiovascular system when working with video display terminals. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2015; 6(267): 19–23. https://elibrary.ru/uchpuf (in Russian).
17. Belyaev O.V., Kuznetsova Z.M. Complex analysis of risk factors of arterial hypertension in persons engaged in managerial work. Kardiologiya. 2006; 4: 20–23. https://elibrary.ru/motdix (in Russian).
18. Vlasova E.M., Malyutina N.N., Khoroshavin V.A. Production-related diseases of computer workers (clinical and hygienic aspects, health correction). Perm Medical Journal. 2008; 2: 98–104. https://elibrary.ru/jtdyef (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Zibarev E.V., Mazhkenov S.A., Kravchenko O.K., Nikonova S.M., Mukhin K.S. The importance of psychophysiological factors in the development of fatigue in digital technology workers. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2026;66(3):148-158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2026-66-3-148-158. EDN: lshbqi
JATS XML






































