

Physiological and hygienic assessment of the safety of the use of an industrial exoskeleton in the conditions of labor activity modeling
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-1-18-27
EDN: ktskmm
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Introduction. The object of the study was the dynamics of the functional state of the human body when performing physical work using an industrial exoskeleton designed to unload the muscles of the back and arms when lifting, lowering, carrying and holding loads weighing up to 50 kg.
The study aims to assess the safety of using an industrial exoskeleton in labor modeling.
Materials and methods. The authors assessed the functional state of a person within the framework of the developed laboratory model of the labor activity of a potential consumer of an industrial exoskeleton using biomedical methods: medical examination, registration of biomechanics of movements and a questionnaire. The data obtained was subjected to statistical analysis.
Results. The use of an industrial exoskeleton does not affect the overall functional condition of the volunteer and does not restrict movement in the lower extremities, but it may partially restrict movement in the shoulder joints and make it difficult to perform movements in the thoracolumbar spine. The volunteer may experience local discomfort in the places where the exoskeleton parts come into contact with the skin: in the anterior surface of the wrist joint, the palmar surfaces of the hand, the anterior surface of the thigh, and the lumbar spine.
Limitations. Only 12 respondents participated in the study, which may limit the possibility of data dissemination among the general population, but statistical processing did not reveal conflicting values between the results of different participants. The authors conducted a safety study on the use of an industrial prov exoskeleton in laboratory conditions that did not fully reproduce real ones and overlooked some factors affecting an employee in production. But the conditions directly related to the use of an industrial exoskeleton were reproduced by the authors.
Conclusion. The study allows us to conclude that the use of an industrial exoskeleton is safe if the production operations performed in it are similar to the developed laboratory model. There was no negative effect on the general condition of the volunteers and the range of movements of the lower extremities. Limitations of the movements of the upper extremities and in the thoracolumbar spine were noted, related to the design characteristics of an industrial exoskeleton. It is necessary to change the features of an industrial exoskeleton, which can lead to the formation of microtrauma.
Ethics. The study was conducted in compliance with the protocol "Safety and Effectiveness study of industrial exoskeletons", approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health (Minutes No. 1 of the meeting of the Local Ethics Committee dated 01/25/2023).
Contributions:
Shuporin E.S. — research concept and design, writing, editing;
Chudova E.S. — writing, editing;
Ilyenko O.V. — research concept and design, writing;
Vaga I.N. — data collection and processing;
Motkova T.Y. — data collection and processing.
Funding. The funding was provided as part of the State Assignment for Basic Scientific Research. The study had no funding.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Received: 14.11.2024 / Accepted: 19.12.2024 / Published: 07.02.2025
About the Authors
Evgenii S. ShuporinRussian Federation
Acting Head of the Laboratory and Researcher at the Laboratory for Personal Protective Equipment and Industrial Exosceletons
e-mail: ppe-lab@irioh.ru
Elena S. Chudova
Russian Federation
Junior research assistant at the Laboratory for Personal Protective Equipment and Industrial Exosceletons
e-mail: ppe-lab@irioh.ru
Oleg V. Ilyenko
Russian Federation
Junior research assistant at the Laboratory for Personal Protective Equipment and Industrial Exosceletons
e-mail: ppe-lab@irioh.ru
Ivan N. Vaga
Russian Federation
Engineer at the Laboratory for Personal Protective Equipment and Industrial Exosceletons
e-mail: ppe-lab@irioh.ru
Tatyana Yu. Motkova
Russian Federation
Technician at the Laboratory for Personal Protective Equipment and Industrial Exosceletons
e-mail: ppe-lab@irioh.ru
References
1. Kanonin Yu.N., Tikhomirov O.I. Prospects for the use of industrial exoskeletons in railway transport as personal protective equipment. Izvestiya Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobshcheniya. 2024; 21(2): 370-379. https://doi.org/10.20295/1815-588X-2024-02-370-379 (in Russian).
2. About the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2023: State report. Moskva: Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2024: 364 (in Russian).
3. Geregei A.M., Shitova E.S., Malakhova I.S., Shuporin E.S., Bondaruk E.V., Efimov A.R., Takh V.Kh. Up-to-date techniques for examining safety and physiological efficiency of industrial exoskeletons. Health Risk Analysis. 2020; 3: 148-159. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2020.3.18.eng
4. De Looze M.P., Bosch T., Krause F., Stadler K.S., O’Sullivan L.W. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomic. 2015; 59(5): 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988
5. Zheng L., Lowe B., Hawke A., Wu J. Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2021; 49(4): 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2022041509
6. Li-Baboud Y.-S., Virts A., Bostelman R., Yoon S., Rahman A., Rhode L. et.al. Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons. Sensors. 2023; 23(12): 5604. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125604
7. Hoffmann N., Prokop G., Weidner, R. Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications. Ergonomics. 2021; 65(2): 276-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1970823
8. Kuber P.M., Rashedi E. Product ergonomics in industrial exoskeletons: potential enhancements for workforce efficiency and safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2020; 22(6): 729-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1850905
9. Cho K., Kim Y., Yi D., Jung M., Lee K. Analysis and evaluation of a combined human - exoskeleton model under two different constraints condition. In: Conference: International Summit on Human Simulation 2012, At St. Pete Beach, FL; 2012.
10. Masood J., Nieto A., Victor A., Blanco M., Voilque A., Bou J. Industrial wearable exoskeleton and exosuit assessment process. 4th International Symposium on Wearable Robotics "WeRob2018". 2018: 234−238.
11. Gamza N.A., Grin' G.R., Zhukova T.V. Functional tests in sports medicine. Minsk: Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet fizicheskoy kul'tury; 2012 (in Russian).
12. Cardoso A., Colim A., Sousa N. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Muscle Activity and Discomfort in Industrial Tasks. In: Arezes P. et al. Occupational and Environmental Safety and Health II. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2020; 277: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41486-3_26
13. Bosch T., Eck J., Knitel K., Looze M. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Applied Ergonomics. 2016; 6: 212-217.
14. Skvortsova V.I., Ivanova G.E., Skvortsov D.V. A study of the biomechanics of movements of an ontogenetically oriented kinesotherapy complex. Lechebnaya fizkul'tura i sportivnaya meditsina. 2010; 5(77): 13-18 (in Russian).
15. Kaurkin S.N., Skvortsov D.V., Ivanova G.E. Friendly movements of the shoulder joints and trunk in healthy subjects. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2020; 46(2): 30-37. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013116462002006X (in Russian).
16. Huysamen K., de Looze M., Bosch T., Ortiz J., Toxiri S., O'Sullivan L.W. Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. Applied Ergonomics. 2018; 68: 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.004
17. Grazi L., Trigili E., Caloi N., Ramella G., Giovacchini F., Vitiello N. et. al. Kinematics-Based Adaptive Assistance of a Semi-Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Workers in Static and Dynamic Tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2022; 7(4): 8675-8682. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3188402
18. Zhou X., Zheng L. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors. 2021; 9(3-4): 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1954565
19. Jones R., Arbor A. Pneumatically Powered Lower Limb Exoskeletons. Department of Mechanical Engineering the University of Michigan. https://vk.cc/cI3CJV
20. Goniometric assessment of shoulder range of motion: comparison of testing in supine and sitting positions. https://clck.ru/3Fjfbv
Review
For citations:
Shuporin E.S., Chudova E.S., Ilyenko O.V., Vaga I.N., Motkova T.Yu. Physiological and hygienic assessment of the safety of the use of an industrial exoskeleton in the conditions of labor activity modeling. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2025;65(1):18-27. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-1-18-27. EDN: ktskmm
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)