Problems and prospects of unifying methods to categorize industrial and consumption waste for industrial enterprises
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-10-23-28
Abstract
The authors considered a problem of duality of existing approaches to classification of industrial and consumption waste in Russian Federation. The suggestions also are methodical approaches to unified method for classification of household and industrial waste, which take into account the particularly dangerous properties of individual components of waste — carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reprotoxicity — and categorize waste into 5 classes. Preliminary calculations of jeopardy classes for an enterprise waste were carried out and additional economic costs of a large enterprise are analyzed with a new technique introduction. It is shown that for about 10% of waste types the jeopardy class will increase. An economic entity will need funds for special preparation of temporary waste storage sites with a higher jeopardy class. Environmental charges for negative environmental impact are increasing. To increase objectivity of accounting hazardous properties of waste, necessity is to form a list of chemicals with proven hazardous properties and clear identification of physico-chemical parameters of the waste components that are responsible for those properties manifestation.
Increased attention to highly hazardous waste, adequate methods of collection, temporary storage, transport, disposal should lead to improvement of environment quality, reduce health risks for those in occupational contact with waste and for general population.
About the Authors
Alyona M. AndrishunasRussian Federation
82, Monastyrskaya Str., Perm, 614045
Georgii M. Andrishunas
Russian Federation
93, Komsomolski Ave., Perm, 614990
Ekaterina V. Maksimova
Russian Federation
82, Monastyrskaya Str., Perm, 614045
Tatyana V. Kostousova
Russian Federation
93, Komsomolski Ave., Perm, 614990
Irina V. May
Russian Federation
82, Monastyrskaya Str., Perm, 614045
References
1. Dudnikova A.G. Classification of hazardous waste: two views on one issue. Spravochnikekologa: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2017; 11. Available at: https://www.profiz.ru/eco/11_2017/san_klassy_opasnosti/ (in Russian).
2. Determination of waste hazard class. Otkhody.Ru: otraslevoy portal. Available at: http://vtorothodi.ru/vse-ob-otxodax/vidyotxodov-i-ix-klassifikaciya/ (in Russian).
3. Poddubnyy I.S., Kayrgaliev D.V. Comparative analysis of the criteria for classifying production and consumption waste into hazard classes. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Rossii. 2015; (5): 28–34. (in Russian).
4. Ostrovskiy N.V. On the classifi cation of toxic waste. Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii. 2009; (8): 9 (in Russian).
5. The principle of waste classifi cation. Vtorothodi.ru: otraslevoy portal. Available at: http://vtorothodi.ru/vse-ob-otxodax/vidyotxodov-i-ix-klassifikaciya/ (in Russian).
6. The problem of double classifi cation of waste requires a solution. Tverdye bytovye otkhody: otraslevoy portal. Available at: http://www.solidwaste.ru/news/view/23592.html (in Russian).
7. Samutin N.M., Zholdakova Z.I., Butorina N.N., Ustinov A.K. Comparative evaluation of procedures of Russian hygienic and environmental normative-methodical documents on the defi nition on the hazardous waste class. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2017; 96 (6): 523–7 (in Russian).
8. Basov A.V., Belonogova Yu.O., Oshchepkova A.Z. The role of the FCCW in the organization of the waste management system. Tverdye bytovye otkhody. 2018; 1: 52–4 (in Russian).
9. Popova E.V., Maksimova E.V., Andrishunas A.M., Andrishunas G.M. On the problem of harmonization of interdepartmental approaches to the defi nition of the class of danger of waste in the Russian Federation. Aktual’nye voprosy analiza riska pri obespechenii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya i zashchity prav potrebiteley: VIII Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Perm; 2018; 113–8 (in Russian).
10. Waste Classifi cation. Guidance on the classifi cation and assessment of waste. 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/541392/DRAFT_Technical_Guidance_WM3.pdf
11. Stepanenko V.S. Environmental policy in the field of waste management in the EU and in Russia. NB: Natsional’naya bezopasnost’. 2012; 2: 48–102. (in Russian).
12. Bortnikov N.S., Gurbanov A.G., Bogatikov O.A., Karamurzov B.S., Dokuchaev A. Ya., Leksin A.B., Gazeev V.M., Shevchenko A.V. Influence of buried industrial waste from Tyrnyauz tungsten-molybdenum mining complex on the ecological conditions (soil-plant layer) in Elbrus area (Kabardino-Balkar Republic). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2013; 5: 405–16. (in Russian).
13. Kassimov A.M. Dangerous wastes: general situation and new solutions in the handling of dangerous and toxic waste in the industry of Ukraine. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. 2014; 10(1): 51–7. (in Russian).
14. Kiseleva L.M. Hazardous wastes properties canceled and hazard remains. Klimat i priroda. 2014; 2(11): 14–21 (in Russian).
15. Thakur P., Ganguly R., Dhulia A. Occupational Health Hazard Exposure among municipal solid waste workers in Himachal Pradesh, India. Waste Management. 2018; 78: 483–9.
16. Ma W., Tai L., Qiao Z., Fu K., Chen G. Contamination source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil around municipal solid waste incinerator: A case study in North China. Science of the Total Environment. 2018; 631–632: 348–57 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.011
Review
For citations:
Andrishunas A.M., Andrishunas G.M., Maksimova E.V., Kostousova T.V., May I.V. Problems and prospects of unifying methods to categorize industrial and consumption waste for industrial enterprises. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2018;(10):23-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-10-23-28