Metabolomic study of plasma in people exposed to asbestos-containing dust in the air of the work area
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-10-687-692
EDN: spjllk
Abstract
The widespread use of asbestos-containing materials, a large number of asbestos deposits, and a long and latent period of development of asbestos-associated diseases still make it relevant to study the molecular aspects of the development of pathological conditions caused by contact with asbestos. A deeper understanding of the changes that occur in response to exposure can help diagnose, prevent irreversible changes in lung tissue, and assess the risk of developing asbestos-associated diseases.
The study aims to explore the plasma metabolome of people exposed to asbestos-containing dust.
The authors have examined 20 employees of the chrysotile asbestos mining and processing enterprise. The main group included male interns who were exposed to asbestos-containing dust in the air of the work area. The comparison group included men who work at the same enterprise and have no contact with asbestos-containing dust.
A semi-quantitative metabolomic analysis of human plasma was performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Laboratory findings demonstrated significant changes in the levels of three metabolites (betaine, valerylcarnitine, and PE 38:6) in the exposed workers compared to the controls. Distribution of the subjects by chrysotile exposure levels revealed statistical differences in concentrations of ten metabolites, including choline, valerylcarnitine, LPC 17:0, LPC P-18:1, LPC 19:1, LPC 20:1, LPE O-18:1, PC 40:8, PC 37:4, and SM 33:1;O2.
The plasma metabolite levels in the workers occupationally exposed to asbestos dust may indicate changes in the composition of the lung surfactant and energy metabolism disturbance. Phospholipid metabolism was most affected, reflecting the reaction to lung damage, the direction and degree of change of which probably depend on the intensity of exposure.
Limitations. The sample is limited by the small number of participants and their male gender.
Ethics. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles set out in the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association and approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers (Protocol No. 7 dated 03.10.2022).
Contributions:
Unesikhina M.S. — research concept and design, material collection and data processing, statistical processing, text writing;
Sutunkova M.P. — research concept and design, editing;
Kikot A.M. — editing;
Drugova O.G. — editing.
All authors — approving the final version of the article and ensuring the integrity of all parts of the article.
Funding. The study had no funding.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Received: 27.08.2025 / Accepted: 29.10.2025 / Published: 21.11.2025
About the Authors
Maria S. UnesikhinaRussian Federation
Junior Researcher, Department of Molecular Biology and Electron Microscopy, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers.
e-mail: unesihinams@ymrc.ru
Marina P. Sutunkova
Russian Federation
Director, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers; Head of the Department of Occupational Hygiene and Medicine, Ural State Medical University; Dr. of Sci. (Med.).
e-mail: sutunkova@ymrc.ru
Anna M. Kikot
Russian Federation
Researcher, Department of Molecular Biology and Electron Microscopy, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers.
e-mail: kikotam@ymrc.ru
Olga G. Drugova
Russian Federation
Senior Researcher, Department of Occupational Medicine, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Dr. of Sci. (Biol.).
e-mail: drugovao@ymrc.ru
References
1. Gualtieri A.F., Lassinantti Gualtieri M., Scognamiglio V., Di Giuseppe D. Human health hazards associated with asbestos in building materials. In: Malik J.A., Marathe S., eds. Ecological and Health Effects of Building Materials. Springer Cham; 2022: 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76073-1_16
2. Pawełczyk A., Božek F. Health risk associated with airborne asbestos. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015; 187(7): 428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4614-3
3. McKeagney T.F.P., Addley K., Asanati K. Occupational lung disease survey of respiratory physicians in Northern Ireland. Occup. Med. (Lond). 2015; 65(9): 719–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv094
4. Goldberg M., Luce D. The health impact of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos: What do we know? Eur. J. Cancer. Prev. 2009; 18(6): 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832f9bee
5. Lenshin A.V., Il'in A.V., Mal'tseva T.A., Kraynov S.A. X-ray diagnostics of domestic asbestosis of chest organs in different generations of one family. Byulleten’ Fiziologii i Patologii Dykhaniya. 2015; (58): 96–108 (in Russian).
6. Gualtieri A.F., Lusvardi G., Pedone A., Di Giuseppe D., Zoboli A., Mucci A. et al. Structure model and toxicity of the product of biodissolution of chrysotile asbestos in the lungs. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019; 32(10): 2063-77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00220
7. Bernstein D.M. The health effects of short fiber chrysotile and amphibole asbestos. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2022; 52(2): 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2022.2056430
8. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 2012; 100(Pt C): 11–465.
9. Marsili D., Terracini B., Santana V.S., Ramos-Bonilla J.P., Pasetto R., Mazzeo A. et al. Prevention of asbestos-related disease in countries currently using asbestos. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016; 13(5): 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050494
10. Gazzano E., Foresti E., Lesci I.G., Tomatis M., Riganti C., Fubini B., et al. Different cellular responses evoked by natural and stoichiometric synthetic chrysotile asbestos. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005; 206(3): 356–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.021
11. Bhattacharjee P., Paul S., Bhattacharjee P. Risk of occupational exposure to asbestos, silicon and arsenic on pulmonary disorders: Understanding the genetic-epigenetic interplay and future prospects. Environ. Res. 2016; 147: 425–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.038
12. Hiraku Y., Sakai K., Shibata E., Kamijima M., Hisanaga N., Ma N. et al. Formation of the nitrative DNA lesion 8-nitroguanine is associated with asbestos contents in human lung tissues: A pilot study. J. Occup. Health. 2014; 56(3): 186–96. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.13-0231-oa
13. Li P., Liu T., Kamp D.W., Lin Z., Wang Y., Li D., et al. The c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathway mediates chrysotile asbestos-induced alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015; 11(5): 3626–34. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.3119
14. Riganti C., Aldieri E., Bergandi L., Tomatis M., Fenoglio I., Costamagna C., et al. Long and short fiber amosite asbestos alters at a different extent the redox metabolism in human lung epithelial cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2003; 193(1): 106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00339-9
15. Johnson C.H., Ivanisevic J., Siuzdak G. Metabolomics: Beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016; 17(7): 451–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.25
16. Agassandian M., Mallampalli R.K. Surfactant phospholipid metabolism. Biochim. Biophys Acta. 2013; 1831(3): 612–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.010
17. Konstantinova S.V., Tell G.S., Vollset S.E., Nygård O., Bleie Ø., Ueland P.M. Divergent associations of plasma choline and betaine with components of metabolic syndrome in middle age and elderly men and women. J. Nutr. 2008; 138(5): 914–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.5.914
18. Zhou M., Xue C., Fan Y., Wu N., Ma J., Ye Q. Plasma metabolic profiling in patients with silicosis and asbestosis. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021; 63(9): 787–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002232
19. Zhao Y.D., Yin L., Archer S., Lu C., Zhao G., Yao Y., et al. Metabolic heterogeneity of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A metabolomic study. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2017; 4(1): e000183. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000183
20. Rindlisbacher B., Schmid C., Geiser T., Bovet C., Funke-Chambour M. Serum metabolic profiling identified a distinct metabolic signature in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis — a potential biomarker role for LysoPC. Respir. Res. 2018; 19(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0714-2
21. Yan F., Wen Z., Wang R., Luo W., Du Y., Wang W., et al. Identification of the lipid biomarkers from plasma in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by Lipidomics. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017; 17(1): 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0513-4
22. Chen Z., Song S., Yang C., Dai Z., Gao Y., Li N., et al. Lipid profiling in malignant mesothelioma reveals promising signatures for diagnosis and prognosis: A plasma-based LC-MS lipidomics study. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2022; 524: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2021.11.024
23. Tetley T.D., Richards R.J., Harwood J.L. Changes in pulmonary surfactant and phosphatidylcholine metabolism in rats exposed to chrysotile asbestos dust. Biochem. J. 1977; 166(3): 323–9. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1660323
Review
For citations:
Unesikhina M.S., Sutunkova M.P., Kikot A.M., Drugova O.G. Metabolomic study of plasma in people exposed to asbestos-containing dust in the air of the work area. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2025;65(10):687-692. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-10-687-692. EDN: spjllk






































