Radiation research methods in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis

Introduction. Pneumoconiosis is a chronic lung disease that develops with prolonged exposure to dust factors in production. The absence of pronounced symptoms in the early stages often leads to delayed diagnosis, when serious consequences, including disability, are already developing. Due to the lack of specific clinical and laboratory signs, chest X-ray, previously considered the standard of diagnosis, remained the main method of detecting pathology for a long time.

The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of methods of radiation diagnosis of pneumoconiosis in workers of the mining and metallurgical industries, as well as to identify typical tomographic signs characterizing this disease.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health (Moscow) and the Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2. A total of 105 patients with suspected pneumoconiosis, based on chest radiographic findings, were included. All participants underwent a comprehensive diagnostic protocol including laboratory tests, pulmonary function assessment, bronchoscopy, and high-resolution computed tomography (CT) of the chest organs.

Results. Computed tomography has demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy compared to X-ray. The sensitivity of the X-ray method was 85.1% (95% CI: 76.28–91.61%), while its specificity was limited to 9.1% (95% CI: 0.23–41.28%). In the case of CT, sensitivity reached 98.9% and specificity 81.8% (95% CI: 94.21–99.97% and 48.22–97.72%, respectively). According to the CT results, the patients were classified according to the shape of the lesion into three groups: nodular (n=41), interstitial (n=15) and combined (n=38). The majority (56.2%) had respiratory failure, while five had pulmonary tuberculosis. Typical CT signs were multiple foci, mainly of perilymphatic distribution, as well as thickening of the interlobular structures of the lungs.

Limitations. The sample size was limited by the number of patients with confirmed pneumoconiosis.

Conclusion. Computed tomography is a more accurate method of detecting pneumoconiosis compared to radiography. It was found that the CT sensitivity and specificity indices (98.9% and 81.8%) significantly exceed the corresponding values for radiography (85.1% and 9.1%). This confirms the need to include CT in standard diagnostic protocols for occupational lung diseases.

Ethics. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health (extract from the minutes of the meeting No. 6 dated 06/17/2014).

Contributions:
Kovaleva A.S. — collecting material and data processing, writing text;
Bukhtiyarov I.V. — concept, design and organization of research;
Strizhakov L.A. — concept, design and organization of research;
All co-authors — responsibility for approving the final version of the article and ensuring the integrity of all parts of the article.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received: 29.06.2025 / Accepted: 07.07.2025 / Published: 05.08.2025

1. Izmerov N.F., Chuchalin A.G. (ed.). Occupational diseases of the respiratory system. National leadership. 2015; 363–552. https://elibrary.ru/vezbej (in Russian).

2. Basanets A.V. HRCT for the diagnosis of early stages of pneumoconiosis from exposure to coal dust. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2007; 4: 22–30. https://elibrary.ru/kglfnj (in Russian).

3. Barral M., Rodriguez Castilla M., Garcia Serrano J. et al. Silicosis: A pictorial review. EPOS. 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.1594/ecr2012/C-1222

4. Castranova V., Valyathan V. Silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000; 108: 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108s4675

5. Lee W.J., Choi B.S. Utility of digital radiography for the screening of pneumoconiosis as compared to analog radiography: radiation dose, image quality, and pneumoconiosis classification. Health Physics. 2012; 103(1): 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0b013e318249ac5d

6. Leung C.C., Yu I.T., Chen W. Silicosis. Lancet. 2012; 379(9830): 2008–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60235-9

7. Rosenman K.D., Reilly M.J., Gardiner J. Results of spirometry among individuals in a silicosis registry. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010; 52(12): 1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e3181fc5e50

8. Hodnett P.A., Naidich D.P. Fibrosing interstitial lung disease. A practical high-resolution computed tomography-based approach to diagnosis and management 132 and a review of the literature. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 188: 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201208-1544ci

9. Meijer E., Tjoe Nij E., Kraus T., van der Zee J.S. et al. Pneumoconiosis and emphysema in construction workers: results of HRCT and lung function findings. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011; 68(7): 542–546. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2010.055616

10. Baur X., Heger M., Bohle R.M., Hering K.G. et al. Diagnostics and Expert Opinion in the Occupational Disease No. 4101 Silicosis. Pneumologie. 2016; 70(12): 782–812. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1038281

11. Begin R., Ostiguy G., Fillion R. et al. Computed tomographyscan in the early detection of silicosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1991; 144: 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/144.3_pt_1.697

12. Antao V.C., Pinheiro G.A., Terra-Filho M., et al. High-resolution CT in silicosis: correlation with radiographic findings and functional impairment. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2005; 29: 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000160424.56261.bc

13. Kovaleva A.S., Serova N.S., Bukhtiyarov I.V. Diagnostic efficacy of radiation research methods in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis. Russian electronic journal of radiology (REJR). 2020; 10(2): 87-92. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2020-10-2-87-92

14. Kovaleva A.S., Serova N.S., Bukhtiyarov I.V. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pneumoconiosis. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya. 2020; 11(3): 38–43. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-3-38-43