Preview

Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology

Advanced search

Assessing the parameters of electromagnetic fields and microclimate in the radionuclide department of the positron emission tomography centre

https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-12-830-834

EDN: untuqc

Abstract

Currently, in the Russian Federation there is an increase in the number of positron emission tomography scans. As a result, the collective dose from radionuclide diagnostics in 2021 compared to 2020 increased by 62.0%, the average effective dose per one study in positron emission tomography (PET) centres of Moscow from 2015 to 2019. increased from 1.71 to 4.41 mSv. This leads to an increase in radiation doses not only for patients, but also for medical workers, and makes it urgent to develop modern effective measures to prevent the adverse effects of ionizing radiation.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the parameters of electromagnetic fields and microclimate in the premises of the radionuclide department of the PET centre.

During the study, in the main working areas of the radionuclide department, the following levels were assessed: the strength levels of electric and magnetic fields of industrial frequency, relative humidity, temperature and air speed using generally accepted measures in occupational hygiene.

zThe main parameters of electromagnetic fields and microclimate (temperature, humidity, air speed) comply with hygienic standards in industrial workplaces. At the same time, in certain working areas of the radionuclide department, higher levels of electromagnetic fields were recorded, as well as a decrease in relative humidity and air velocity.

Monitoring the parameters of electromagnetic fields and microclimate is important for improving the working conditions of medical workers in the radionuclide department of the PET centre, which helps maintain the functional state of workers at a high level, increases concentration and accuracy of movements, increases the speed of work manipulations, and reduces the time of contact with radionuclides when administered to patients and thereby reduce the dose load on health workers.

Ethics. The study does not require the opinion of this committee.

Contribution:
Zabroda N.N. — concept and design of the study, collection and processing of material, analysis of the results, writing the text;
Zhernov Y.V. — concept and design of research, formulation of scientific hypotheses;
Zakharova A.V. — definition of the goal, scientific guidance of research, scientific editing;
Matskevich E.I. — interpretation and discussion of the research results.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 27.11.2023 / Accepted: 06.12.2023 / Published: 29.12.2023

About the Authors

Nadezhda N. Zabroda
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


Yury V. Zhernov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


Anastasia V. Zakharova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Assistant of the Department of General Hygiene F. Erismann Institute of Public Health I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

e-mail: zakharova_a_v_3@staff.sechenov.ru



Еlena I. Matkevich
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre
Russian Federation


References

1. Yamamoto H., Hattori T. Synthesis of Fluorine-Containing Amino Acids from Sulfamidates and Potassium Fluoride. Synfacts. 2022; 18(05): 567. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1737573

2. Orlovskaja V.V., Fedorova O.S., Studentsov E.P. et al. New fluorine-18 labelled benzaldehydes as precursors in the synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography. Russian Chemical Bulletin. 2016; 65: 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-016-1330-2

3. Chipiga L.A., Ladanova E.R., Vodovatov A.V., et al. Trend in the development of nuclear medicine in the Russian Federation for 2015–2020. Radiatsionnaya gigiena. 2022; 4: 122-133 (in Russian).

4. Golikov V.Yu., Chipiga L.A., Vodovatov A.V., Smolyarchuk M.Ya. Some aspects of radiation protection in radionuclide therapy departments. Radiatsionnaya gigiena. 2021; 14(1): 75–85 (in Russian).

5. Okhrimenko S.E., Ilyin L.A., Korenkov I.P., Morozov S.P., Biryukov A.P., Gombolevsky V.A., Prokhorov N.I., Lantukh Z.A., Ryzhov S.A. Optimization of radiation doses to patients in radiation diagnostics. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2019: 98(12): 1331–1337 (in Russian).

6. "On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Russian Federation in 2022: State report. M.: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare, 2023".

7. Results of radiation-hygienic certification in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for 2019. M.: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare; 2020.

8. Balonov M.I., Golikov V.Yu., Zvonova I.A., Kalnitsky S.A., Repin V.S., Sarycheva S.S., Chipiga L.A. Current levels of medical exposure in Russia. Radiatsionnaya gigiena. 2015; 4(8): 67–79 (in Russian).

9. Yarmoshenko I.V., Malinovsky G.P., Onishchenko A.D., Vasilyev A.V. The problem of radon exposure in buildings with a high energy efficiency class. Radiatsionnaya gigiena. 2019; 12(4): 56–65 (in Russian).

10. SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 "Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and(or) harmlessness of environmental factors to humans". M.; 2021 (in Russian).

11. Okhrimenko S.E., Korenkov I.P., Prokhorov N.I., Shandala N.K., Zakharova A.V. Radiation-hygienic assessment of modern medical technologies. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2020; 99(9): 939–946 (in Russian).

12. Ryzhov S.A., Vodovatov A.V., Soldatov I.V. and others. Proposals for improving the radiation safety system for medical exposure. Radiatsionnaya gigiena. 2022; 15(3): 99–109 (in Russian).

13. Omer Hiba, Salah H., Taman N. et al. Assessment of occupational exposure from PET and PET/CT scanning in Saudi Arabia. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2023; 194(04): 110642.5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110642

14. Mario Marengo, Sietske Rubow. The relative contribution of photons and positrons to skin dose in the handling of PET radiopharmaceuticals. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2023; 194(04): 11070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110705

15. Elshami Wiam, Uslu Erdemir R., Abuzaid M.M., Cavli Baris, Issa Bashar, Tekin H.O. Occupational radiation dose assessment for nuclear medicine workers in Turkey: A comprehensive investigation. Journal of King Saud University. Science. 2022; 34: 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102005

16. Ryzhov S.A. Radiation accidents and errors in the activities of medical personnel. Meditsinskaya fizika. 2022; 3(95): 31–32 (in Russian).

17. Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report Volume I. Annex A.


Review

For citations:


Zabroda N.N., Zhernov Yu.V., Zakharova A.V., Matkevich Е.I. Assessing the parameters of electromagnetic fields and microclimate in the radionuclide department of the positron emission tomography centre. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2023;63(12):830-834. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-12-830-834. EDN: untuqc

Views: 250


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1026-9428 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)