The influence of harmful occupational physical factors on the male workers’ reproductive health
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-528-536
EDN: aebgsg
Abstract
This paper provides a review of the literature for the analysis and assessment of the occupational risk of reproductive health disorders of male workers under the influence of harmful physical factors of production.
To assess the risk of exposure to harmful industrial physical factors on the reproductive health of male workers, the authors have applied the method of analytical review of the data obtained.
Literature data show that the work of men in conditions of both high and low temperatures can lead to a violation of reproductive function. In the bakery, ceramic, steel, welding and other industries, working conditions are characterized by the presence of hyperthermia. Researchers have identified a violation of reproductive function in male workers, along with changes in the physiological parameters of the body's homeostasis.
There are few studies on the effects of noise and vibration on the reproductive health of working men, and there are few studies on the effects of ultra- and infrasound. The consequences of such exposure are disorders of hormonal status, spermatogenesis, leading to further changes in reproductive function, impotence and infertility. Scientists confirm these data with experimental studies on animals and volunteers.
Exposure to ionizing radiation is a proven factor of reproductive dysfunction, which leads to changes in the quantity and quality of sperm, reproductive hormones. The consequence of exposure to ionizing radiation are chromosomal abnormalities, leading to congenital anomalies in offspring.
It has been shown that the biological effect of electromagnetic fields of various frequency ranges (cell phones, microwave ovens, laptops, devices with Wi-Fi, as well as other types of non–ionizing radiation — low-frequency electromagnetic fields and extremely high-frequency) on reproductive organs can manifest itself in changes in spermatogenesis indicators, DNA damage, genomic instability, hormonal regulation and work disorders protein kinases, hormones, antioxidant enzymes, leading to disorders of sexual behavior, decreased fertility, up to infertility.
The presented data show that harmful occupational physical factors can lead to violations of the reproductive health of male workers. Currently, there is no systematic approach to solving the problem. In this regard, it is necessary to develop a scientifically sound system for assessing occupational risk and making managerial decisions to preserve reproductive health, since a decrease in the fertility of male workers potentially affects the well-being of the family and society as a whole.
Contribution:
Fesenko M.A. — concept and design of research, analysis and interpretation of data; approval of the final version;
Golovaneva G.V. — concept and design of research, analysis and interpretation of data, the editing;
Miteleva T.Yu. — collection and processing of material, writing the text;
Vujtsik P.A. — collection of material, writing the text of the section of the article.
All co-authors — approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.
Gratitude. The authors express their gratitude to A.V. Miskevich, an employee of the laboratory, for his help in collecting literature.
Funding. The study had no funding.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Received: 29.06.2023 / Accepted: 02.07.2023 / Published: 05.09.2023
About the Authors
Marina A. Fesenko
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation
The Head of Laboratory for the Prevention of Reproductive Health Disorders of employees at the Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health, Dr. of Sci. (Med.).
Russian Federation
The Head of Laboratory for the Prevention of Reproductive Health Disorders of employees at the Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health, Dr. of Sci. (Med.).
e-mail: marnast@mail.ru
Galina V. Golovaneva
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyna Yu. Miteleva
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Peter A. Vuicik
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of June 6, 2019 No. 254 "On the Strategy for the Development of Healthcare in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025". Official Internet portal of legal information: [electronic resource]. https://clck.ru/35BHBj (Accessed 12.06.2022).
2. Mascarenhas M.N., Flaxman S.R., Boerma T., et al. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
3. Boivin J., Bunting L., Collins J.A., et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2007; 22(6): 1506–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046
4. Rutstein S.O., Shah I.H. Infecundity infertility and childlessness in developing countries. Geneva: World Health Organization 2004.
5. WHO. Infertility. Byulleten' Vsemirnoj organizacii zdravoohraneniya. Besplodie. (po sostoyaniyu na 10 noyabrya 2022 g.). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility
6. Agarwal A., Mulgund A., Hamada A., Chyatte M.R. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015; 13: 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
7. Belyj L.E. Lifestyle factors and their impact on male fertility. Klinicheskij razbor v akusherstve, ginekologii i reproduktologii. 2021; 1(1): 29–35. https://doi.org/10.47407/kragr2021.1.1.00006
8. Assidi M. Infertility in Men: Advances towards a Comprehensive and Integrative Strategy for Precision Theranostics. Cells. 2022; 11(10): 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11101711
9. Lebedev G.S., Golubev N.A., Shaderkin I.A. Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistical data for 2000–2018. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2019; 4: 4–13. https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-4-4-12
10. Litvinova N.A., Lesnikova A.I., Tolochko T.A., Shmeleva A.A. Factors affecting male fertility: a review. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2021; 6(2): 124–135. https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2021-6-2-124-135
11. Karel'skaya L.P. Reproductive health of men as a medical and social problem. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference "Medical-social and psychological aspects of the safety of industrial agglomerations". https://elibrary.ru/vtulwl
12. Ramezanifar S., Beyrami S., Mehrifar Y. et al. Occupational Exposure to Physical and Chemical Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Reproductive Pathophysiological Effects in Women and Men. Saf Health Work. 2023; 14(1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.10.005
13. Kapashin V.P., 70th Birth Anniversary. Journal of NBC Protection Corps. 2020; 4(3): 392–393.
14. Hamerezaee M., Dehghan S.F., Golbabaei F., Fathi A., Barzegar L., Heidarnejad N. Assessment of semen quality among workers exposed to heat stress: a crosssectional study in a steel industry. Saf. Health Work. 2018; 9(2): 232–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.003
15. Jung A., Eberl M., Schill W.-B. Improvement of semen quality by nocturnal scrotalcooling and moderate behavioural change to reduce genital heat stress in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Reproduction. 2001; 121: 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210595
16. Ashiru O.A., Odusanya O.O. Fertility and occupational hazards: review of the literature. Afr J. Reprod Health. 2009; 13(1): 159–165. PMID: 20687273
17. Jurewicz J., Radwan M., Sobala W. et al. Effects of occupational exposure — is there a link between exposure based on an occupational questionnaire and semen quality? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014; 60 (4): 227-33. https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2014.907837
18. Hoang-Thi A.P., Dang-Thi A.T., Phan-Van S. et al. The Impact of High Ambient Temperature on Human Sperm Parameters: A Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2022; 51(4): 710–723. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i4.9232
19. Potemina T.E., Tukmakova T.S. The effect of thermal exposure on spermatogenesis in the experiment. Sovremennye tekhnologii v medicine. 2011; 4: 99–101.
20. Halimov Yu.Sh., Zajcev V.A., Matveev S.Yu. Status of the pituitary-gonadal sistem and spermatogenesis in troops, participated in the destruction of chemical weapons. Endokrinologiya. Novosti. Mneniya. Obuchenie. 2016; 2(15): 74–79. https://elibrary.ru/whouvf
21. Berdysh D.S., Mirzoeva R.K. Influence of physical factors on the motility of human spermatozoa. Mezhdunarodnyj studencheskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2018; 4-3. https://elibrary.ru/xplfud
22. Abdelhamid M.H.M., Walschaerts M., Ahmad G. et al. Mild experimental increase in testis and epididymis temperature in men: effects on sperm morphology according to spermatogenesis stages. Transl Androl Urol. 2019; 8(6): 651–665. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.11.18
23. Wu Y.Q., Rao M., Hu S.F. et al. Effect of transient scrotal hyperthermia on human sperm: an iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 12; 18(1): 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00640-w
24. Vasil'ev V.S. Morphometric and kinetic parameters of human sperm before and after exposure to low temperatures in various states of spermatogenesis. Zdorov'e muzhchiny. 2009; 2: 184–186.
25. Ristovska G., Laszlo H.E., Hansell A.L. Reproductive outcomes associated with noise exposureda systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(8): 7931–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110807931
26. Figà-Talamanca I. Occupational risk factors and reproductive health of women. Occupational Medicine. 2006; 56 (8): 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql114
27. Alekseev S.B., Kadyskina E.N., Suvorov G.A. Production noise. Medicina; 1991: 134.
28. Mohammadi H., Golbabaei F., Dehghan S.F. et al. Relationship between occupational exposure to whole-body vibration and noise with sex hormone levels: an empirical assessment in an automobile parts manufacturing plant. Toxicol Ind Health. 2021; 37(7): 377–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/07482337211006535
29. Penkov I.A., Tzvetkov D. Effect of vibration on male reproductive system and function. Cent Eur J Public Heath. 1999; 7(3): 149–154.
30. De Fleurian G., Perrin J., Ecochard R. et al. Occupational exposures obtained by questionnaire in clinical practice and their association with semen quality. J Androl. 2009; 30(5): 566–79. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005918
31. Zarei S., Dehghan S.F., Vaziri M.H. et al. Assessment of semen quality of taxi drivers exposed to whole body vibration. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2022; 17: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-022-00357-z
32. Krajnak K., Waugh S., Welcome D. et al. Effects of whole-body vibration on reproductive physiology in a rat model of whole-body vibration. J. Toxicol Environ Health A. 2022; 85(23): 953–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2022.2128954
33. Health Effects of Exposure to Ultrasound and Infrasound. Report of the independent Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation Documents of the Health Protection Agency Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards. 2010; February; 89–94.
34. Dergilev A.A., Chibisova O.F., Palyga G.F. et al. Effect of exposure of rat male germ cells in the pre-meiotic phase of spermatogenesis to radiation at doses below a castration level on ontogenesis of two generations of posterity. Radiatsiya i risk. 2012; 21(2): 39–45. https://elibrary.ru/oxpkrf
35. Zajcev V.A., Cepkova G.A., Goverdovskij Yu.B. Reproductive health of men under the influence of the complex of harmful professional and environmental factors. Vrach. 2020; (8): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2020-08-07
36. Kumar S. Occupational exposure associated with reproductive dysfunction. J Occup Health. 2004; 46(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.46.1
37. Grajewski B., Cox C., Schrader S.M. et al. Semen quality and hormone levels among radiofrequency heater operators. J. Occup Environ Med. 2000; 42(10): 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200010000-00005
38. Lyaginskaya A.M., Shandala N.K., Kiselev S.M. et al. The health state of the enterprises personnel for the management of radioactive waste of the USSR dismantled nuclear fleet. Radiaciya i risk (Byulleten' Nacional'nogo radiacionno-epidemiologicheskogo registra). 2019; 28(4): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2019-28-4-73-87
39. Li D.K., Yan B. et al. Exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of poor sperm quality. Reprod Toxicol. 2010; 29(1): 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.09.004
40. Rai U., Singh R. Genotoxic Risks to Male Reproductive Health from Radiofrequency Radiation. Cells. 2023; 12(4): 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040594
41. Avendano C., Mata A., Sarmiento C.S., Doncel G. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.012
42. Behari J. Biological correlates of low-level electromagnetic-field exposure, general. Applied and systems toxicology. Willey, Book chapter. 2009; 109.
43. Singh R., Nath R., Mathur A.K. et al. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res. 2018; 148: 92–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1056_18
44. Repacholi M.H. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998; 19: 1–19. PMID: 9453702.
45. Paulraj R., Behari J. Radio frequency radiation effects on protein kinase C activity in rats’ brain. Mutat Res. 2004; 545: 127–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(03)00113-1
46. Aitken R.J., Bennetts L.E., Sawyer D. et al. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl. 2005; 28: 171–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00531.x
47. Erogul O., Oztas E., Yildirim I., Kir T. et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: An in vitro study. Arch Med Res. 2006; 37: 840–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.05.003
48. Agarwal A., Singh A., Hamada A. et al. Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. Int Braz J Urol. 2011; 37: 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382011000400002
49. Bernabò N., Tettamanti E., Pistilli M.G. et al. Effects of 50 Hz extremely low frequency magnetic field on the morphology and function of boar spermatozoa capacitated in vitro. Theriogenology. 2007; 67: 801–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.10.014
50. Kilgallon S.J., Simmons L.W. Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biol Lett. 2005; 1: 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0324
51. Al-Bayyari N. The effect of cell phone usage on semen quality and fertility among Jordanian males. Middle East Fertil Society J. 2017; 22: 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEFS.2017.03.006
52. Hatch E.E., Willis S.K., Wesselink A.K. et al. Male cellular telephone exposure, fecundability, and semen quality: results from two preconception cohort studies. Hum Reprod. 2021; 20; 36 (5): 1395–1404. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab001
53. Kesari K.K., Agarwal A., Henkel R. Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018, 9; 16 (1): 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1
54. Kumar S., Kesari K.K., Behari J. The therapeutic effect of a pulsed electromagnetic field on the reproductive patterns of male Wistar rats exposed to a 2.45-GHz microwave field. Clin (Sao Paulo). 2011; 66: 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.700292
55. Kesari K.K., Behari J. Evidence for mobile phone radiation exposure effects on reproductive pattern of male rats: role of ROS. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012; 31: 213–222. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.700292
56. Seyhan N., Guler G. Review of in vivo static and ELF electric fields studies performed at Gazi biophysics department. Electromag Biol Med. 2006; 25: 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370601054803
57. Türedi S., Hancı H., Topal Z. et al. The effects of prenatal exposure to a 900-MHz electromagnetic field on the 21-day-old male rat heart. Electromag Biol Med. 2015; 34(4): 390. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2014.952742
58. Yan J.G., Agresti M., Bruce T. et al. Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.022
59. Kesari K., Kumar S., Behari J. Mobile phone usage and male infertility in Wistar rats. Ind J Exp Biol. 2010; 48: 987–992. PMID: 21299041.
60. Bhat M.A. Effects of Electromagnetic Waves Emitted by Mobile Phones on Male Fertilit. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems. 2013; 4(3): 51–64.
61. Luo Y., Wang X., Chen Y. et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation on morphology and TGF-β3 expression in mouse testicular tissue. Toxicology. 2013; 310: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.004
62. Kumar S., Nirala J.P., Behari J., Paulraj R. Effect of electromagnetic irradiation produced by 3G mobile phone on male rat reproductive system in a simulated scenario. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2014; 52: 890–897.
63. Avendano C., Mata A., Sarmiento C.S., Doncel G. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.012
64. Al-Akhras M.A., Elbetieha A., Hasan M.K. et al. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on fertility of adult male and female rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001; 22: 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166
65. Lee J.S., Ahn S.S., Jung K.C. et al. Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure on testicular germ cell apoptosis in mice. Asian J Androl. 2004; 6: 29–34.
66. Agarwal A., Deepinder F., Sharma R.K. et al. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89: 124–128.
67. Sharma A., Kesari K.K., Saxena V.K., Sisodia R. The influence of prenatal 10 GHz microwave radiation exposure on a developing mice brain. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2017; 36: 41–51. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2016026
68. De Iuliis G.N., Newey R.J., King B.V., Aitken R.J. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 2009; 4: 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006446
69. Desai N., Sharma R., Makker K. et al. Physiologic and pathologic levels of reactive oxygen species in neat semen of infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1626–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.109
70. Gautam R., Priyadarshini E., Nirala J., Rajamani P. Impact of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation on male infertility: an assessment of the mechanism and consequences. Int J Radiat Biol. 2022; 98(6): 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1859154
71. Sciorio R., Tramontano L., Esteves S.C. Effects of mobile phone radiofrequency radiation on sperm quality. Zygote. 2022; 30(2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719942100037X
72. Gautam R., Singh K.V., Nirala J. et al. Oxidative stress-mediated alterations on sperm parameters in male Wistar rats exposed to 3G mobile phone radiation. Andrologia. 2019; 51(3): 13201. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13201
73. Mailankot M., Kunnath A.P., Jayalekshmi H., Koduru B., Valsalan R. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8 GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009; 64: 5615. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322009000600011
74. Mortazavi S.M.J., Tavassoli A.R., Ranjbari F., Moammaiee P. Effects of laptop computers’ electromagnetic field on sperm quality. J. Reprod Infertil. 2010; 11: 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2011.564232
75. Schrader S.M., Marlow K.L. Asian Assessing the reproductive health of men with occupational exposures. J Androl. 2014; 16(1): 23–30. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122352
Review
For citations:
Fesenko M.A., Golovaneva G.V., Miteleva T.Yu., Vuicik P.A. The influence of harmful occupational physical factors on the male workers’ reproductive health. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2023;63(8):528-536. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-528-536. EDN: aebgsg
Views:
1073
Email this article 
