Preview

Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology

Advanced search

Digitalization of healthcare and health status of medical workers

https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-490-502

EDN: kqqycs

Abstract

The labor activity of modern doctors of various specialties is inextricably linked with pronounced mental, nervous and emotional stress, as well as the complex impact of physical, chemical and biological factors, the simultaneous influence of which can lead to the development of a wide range of occupational diseases. The intensive introduction of digitalization in healthcare also leads to a significant negative impact of modern technologies on the health of doctors and medical personnel.

The analysis of the literature made it possible to identify priority areas for the introduction of digitalization in healthcare: improvement of the regulatory framework for the use of information systems, creation of specialized training centers for employees, development of convenient and well-optimized information systems and interface, scientific justification and development of preventive measures aimed at preserving the health of health workers. In this regard, it is advisable to take measures to develop the skills of safe use of electronic devices, leading a healthy lifestyle, which will further minimize the potential risks of negative impact of information and communication technologies on the health of medical workers.

Contribution:
Kaminer D.D. — writing the text;
Milushkina O.Yu. — the concept and design of the study, the editing;
Sheina N.I. — the editing;
Bulatseva M.B. — writing the text;
Girina M.D. — data collection and processing;
Paleeva M.F. — data collection and processing.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 16.06.2023 / Accepted: 23.08.2023 / Published: 05.09.2023

About the Authors

Dmitrij D. Kaminer
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation


Olga Yu. Milushkina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation


Natalya I. Sheina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Professor of the Department of Hygiene at the Pediatric Faculty of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Dr. of Sci. (Biol.), Professor.

e-mail: ni_sheina@mail.ru



Madina B. Bulatseva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation


Marina D. Girina
Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


Mariya F. Paleeva
Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


References

1. Kirchhoff J.W., Marks A., Helgesen A.K., Andersen K.L., Andreassen H.M., Grøndahl V.A. The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Doctors’ and Registered Nurses’ Working Conditions and Clinical Work — A Cross-Sectional Study in a Norwegian Hospital. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2021; 14: 2941–2949. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S327669

2. Milushkina O.Yu., Skoblina N.A., Markelova S.V., Kaminer D.D., Tatarinchik A.A., Savchuk P.O., Ievleva O. V. Sujective assessment by medical workers of risk factors associated with the use of electronic devices. Zdorov’ye naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2021; 7: 86–94 (in Russian).

3. Kearns M., Kavanagh A., Curran M., Collier D. ICT supporting clinicians and patients – the key facilitator of integrated care. Int. J. Integr. Care. 2017; 17(5): 413. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3732

4. Ying Lee T. The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Patient Safety and Nursing Efficiency. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2018; 250: 192.

5. Bansler J.P. Challenges in user-driven optimization of EHR: a case study of a large Epic implementation in Denmark. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2021; 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.1043949

6. Eremin A.L. Information hygiene: approaches to the hygienic assessment of content and physical signals of information carriers. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2020; 4(99): 351–355. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-4-351-355 (in Russian).

7. Setko N.P., Gladkova L.G., Savin V.P. Modern aspects of preserving the individual health of workers. Materials of the I All-Russian Congress «Profession and Health». Moscow, 2002: 96–98 (in Russian).

8. Bereznoy A.V., Saigitov R.T. «Digital revolution» and innovative business models in healthcare: global trends and Russian realities. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii mreditsinskikh nauk. 2016; 71(3): 200–213 (in Russian).

9. Krasnoslobodtseva N.K. Review of individual areas of healthcare digitalization in the Russian Federation. Collection of the All-Russian Conference of the Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation «Legal regulation in the field of healthcare in the face of new challenges: issues of theory and practice». Tambov; 2022: 286–301 (in Russian).

10. Kotelnikova E.V., Nalivaeva A.V., Karpova E.S., Lyamina N.P. Information and communication technologies in medicine: current trends. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016; 3: 26 (in Russian).

11. Arndt B.G., Beasley J.W., Watkinson M.D., et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann. Fam. Med. 2017; 15(5): 419–26.

12. Cheraghi-Sohi S., Calnan M. Discretion or discretions? Delineating professional discretion: the case of English medical practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2013; 96: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.01110

13. Moore E.C., Tolley C.L., Bates D.W., et al. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. J. Am. Med. Informatics. Assoc. 2020; 27(5): 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz231

14. Timmons S. A failed panopticon: surveillance of nursing practice via new technology. New Tech Work Employ. 2003; 18(2): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.0011612

15. Dean S., Lewis J., Ferguson C. Editorial: is technology responsible for nurses losing touch? J. Clin. Nurs. 2017; 26(5–6): 583–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.1347013

16. Fagerstrom C., Tuvesson H., Axelsson L., Nilsson L. The role of ICT in nursing practice: an integrative literature review of the Swedish context. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2017; 31(3): 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.1237014

17. Dupret K. Working around technologies—invisible professionalism? New Tech Work Employ. 2017; 32: 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ntwe.12093

18. Faller E.M., Bin Miskam N., Pereira A. Exploratory Study on Occupational Health Hazards among Health Care Workers in the Philippines. Ann. Glob. Health. 2018; 84(3): 338–341. https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2316

19. Vijendren A., Yung M., Sanchez J. Occupational health issues amongst UK doctors: a literature review. Occup Med (Lond). 2015; 65(7): 519–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv088

20. Lazarenko V.A., Kalutsky P.V., Dremova N.B. Adaptation of higher medical education to the conditions of digitalization of healthcare. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2020; 29(1): 105–115 (in Russian).

21. Ayaad O., Alloubani A., Abu Alhajaa E., et al. The role of electronic medical records in improving the quality of health care services: comparative study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019; 127: 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.014

22. Fourneyron E., Wittwer J., Rachid Salmi L., & Groupe de recherche Eva TSN. Réalités et défis pour l’organisation du système de santé de premier recours [Health information technology: current use and challenges for primary healthcare services]. Medecine sciences. 2018; 34(6–7): 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20183406000

23. Christlein D., Kast J., Baumhauer M. Gegenwärtige Entwicklungen in der Healthcare-Informationstechnologie: Auswirkungen auf die strukturierte Befundung [Current developments in healthcare information technology: Impact on structured reporting]. Der. Radiologe. 2021; 61(11): 986–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-021-00924-1

24. Arvanitis S., Loukis E.N. Investigating the effects of ICT on innovation and performance of European hospitals: an exploratory study. Eur. J. Health. Economics. 2016; 17(4): 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0686-9

25. Ayaad O., Alloubani A., Abu Alhajaa E., et al. The role of electronic medical records in improving the quality of health care services: comparative study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019; 127: 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.014

26. Seibert K., Domhoff D., Huter K., et al. Application of digital technologies in nursing practice: results of a mixed methods study on nurses’ experiences, needs and perspectives. Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz Fortbildung Und Qualitaet Im Gesundheitswesen. 2020; 158: 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2020.10.010

27. Park Y.T., Kim D., Park R.W., et al. Association between Full Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Drug Use: antibiotics and Polypharmacy. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2020; 26: 68–77. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.68

28. Baxter S.L., Apathy N.C., Cross D.A., Sinsky C., Hribar M.R. Measures of electronic health record use in outpatient settings across vendors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2021; 28(5): 955–959.

29. Shin Y.K., Koskinen V., Kouvonen A., Kemppainen T., Olakivi A., Wrede S., Kemppainen L. Digital Information Technology Use and Transnational Healthcare: A Population-Based Study on Older Russian-Speaking Migrants in Finland. J. Immigr. Minor Health. 2022; 24(1): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01301-9

30. Ivanishcheva I.V. Information technologies in health care. Zdorov’e i obrazovanie v XXI veke. 2010; 4 (in Russian).

31. Fourneyron E., Wittwer J., Rachid Salmi L., & Groupe de recherche Eva TSN. Réalités et défis pour l’organisation du système de santé de premier recours [Health information technology: current use and challenges for primary healthcare services]. Medecine sciences. 2018; 34(6–7): 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20183406000

32. Rahman Jabin M.S., Pan D., Nilsson E. Characterizing healthcare incidents in Sweden related to health information technology affecting care management of multiple patients. Health Informatics J. 2022 Apr–Jun; 28(2): 14604582221105440. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582221105440

33. Ellingsen E., Monteiro E. Big Is Beautiful. Electronic Patient Records in Norway 1980–2000. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2003; 42: 43–65.

34. Zelensky S.S., Tikhanova A.A., Myagkova A.S. The role of information and communication technologies in medicine. Proceedings of the conference «Problems and Prospects in the International Transfer of Innovative Technologies». Ufa; 2018: 133–135 (in Russian).

35. Asmanova R.A. Application of information and communication technologies in medicine. Collection of proceedings of the conference «Trends and innovations of modern science». Neftekamsk; 2022: 125–129 (in Russian).

36. Kolennikova O.A. Knowledge of medical specialists in digital technologies. Narodonaselenie. 2022; 25(3): 189–199 (in Russian).

37. Evdokimov V.I., Gubin A.I. Evaluation of the formation of professional burnout syndrome in doctors and its prevention. Vestnik psihoterapii. 2009; (30): 106–119 (in Russian).

38. Gatin F.F. et al. Prevention of psychological stress and emotional burnout in medical workers. A teaching aid. Kazan: Meditsina; 2007 (in Russian).

39. Popov V.V., D`yakova Yu.А., Novikova I.А. Factors of professional burnout of therapists in polyclinics. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2017; 96(3): 265–269 (in Russian).

40. Ly`marenko V.М., Leont`ev О.V., Gordienko А.V., Sidorenko V.А., Lejchinskij S.V., Sorokin N.V. The study of chronic occupational stress in general practitioners of the district polyclinic medical care of the Nevsky district of St. Petersburg. Vestnik sovremennoj klinicheskoj mediciny. 2012; 5: Appendix 1 (in Russian).

41. Ying Lee T. The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Patient Safety and Nursing Efficiency. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2018; 250: 192.

42. Hong J.Y., Ivory C.H., VanHouten C.B., et al. Disappearing expertise in clinical automation: barcode medication administration and nurse autonomy. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 2021; 28: 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa1358

43. Šendelj R. Information Technology and Information Management in Healthcare. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2020; 274: 139–158. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200674

44. Sinsky C., Colligan L., Li L., et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016; 165(11): 753–60.

45. Robertson S.L., Robinson M.D., Reid A. Electronic health record effects on work-life balance and burnout within the I3 population collaborative. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2017; 9(4): 479–84.

46. Domaney N.M., Torous J., Greenberg W.E. Exploring the association between electronic health record use and burnout among psychiatry residents and faculty: a pilot survey study. Acad. Psychiatry. 2018; 42(5): 648–52.

47. Downing N.L., Bates D.W., Longhurst C.A. Physician burnout in the electronic health record era: Are we ignoring the real cause? Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(1): 50–1.

48. Fagerstrom C., Tuvesson H., Axelsson L., Nilsson L. The role of ICT in nursing practice: an integrative literature review of the Swedish context. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2017; 31(3): 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12370

49. Simpson J.R., Lin C.-T., Sieja A., Sillau S.H., Pell J. Optimizing the electronic health record: An inpatient sprint addresses provider burnout and improves electronic health record satisfaction. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2021; 28(3): 628–631.

50. Robertson S.L., Robinson M.D., Reid A. Electronic health record effects on work-life balance and burnout within the I3 population collaborative. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2017; 9(4): 479–84.

51. Demicheva T.N. Influence of information and communication technologies on the quality and availability of medical services. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2012; 2(2): 81–85 (in Russian).

52. Dutheil F., Parreira L.M., Eismann J., Lesage F.X., Balayssac D., Lambert C., Clinchamps M., Pezet D., Pereira B., Le Roy B. Burnout in French General Practitioners: A Nationwide Prospective Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(22): 12044. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212044

53. Popova K.A., Noskova M.V. Psychological readiness of practitioners for digitalization in medicine. Collection of materials of the V international scientific-practical conference of young scientists and students «Topical issues of modern medical science and health». Yekaterinburg; 2020: 104–109 (in Russian).

54. Guo U., Chen L., Mehta P.H. Electronic health record innovations: helping physicians — one less click at a time. Health. Inf. Manag. 2017; 46 (3): 140–4.

55. Kroth P.J., Morioka-Douglas N., Veres S., et al. The electronic elephant in the room: physicians and the electronic health record. JAMIA. 2018; 1(1): 49–56.

56. McLaughlin J., Webster A. Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identities and power. Sociological Rev. 1998; 46(4): 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00140

57. Sevostyanova O.Yu. The connection between professional burnout and the readiness of doctors to work in the context of digitalization of primary healthcare. Collection of materials of the conference of students and young scientists «Psychology and medicine: ways to find optimal interaction». 2020: 147–156 (in Russian).

58. Sevostyanova O.Yu. The level of readiness of doctors for the process of digitalization in the healthcare system. Materials of the international scientific conference «Modern medicine, new approaches and current research». 2020: 571–576 (in Russian).

59. Rakova K.V. The emergence of complex interactive communication: «patient – doctor – IT-specialist». Kommunikologiya. 2021; 9(2): 31–40 (in Russian).

60. Noskova M.V. The cognitive component of the psychological readiness of doctors for digitalization in healthcare. Materials of the III International scientific-practical conference «Innovation potential of science development in the modern world: achievements and innovations». Ufa; 2020: 280–285 (in Russian).

61. Romanova T.E., Berdutina E.V. Problems of communicative interactions between medical workers and patients in the era of digitalization. Glavvrach. 2022; 5: 6–19 (in Russian).

62. O’Sullivan J.L., Gellert P., Hesse B., Jordan L.M., Möller S., Voigt-Antons J.N., Nordheim J. Exploring attitudes of healthcare professionals towards ICT-based interventions for nursing home residents with dementia: a mixed-methods approach. Contemporary nurse. 2018; 54(1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1421087

63. Konttila J., Siira H., Kyngäs H., Lahtinen M., Elo S., Kääriäinen M., et al. Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: A systematic review. Journal of clinical nursing. 2018; 28(5–6): 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14710

64. Brewster A.L., Curry L.A., Cherlin E.J., Talbert-Slagle K., Horwitz L.I., Bradley E.H. Integrating new practices: a qualitative study of how hospital innovations become routine. Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0357-3

65. Xiao Y., Chen J. Job burnout facing Chinese general practitioners in the context of COVID-19. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2022; 34(2): mzac023. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzac023

66. Pedersen A.F., Vedsted P. Burnout, coping strategies and help-seeking in general practitioners: a two-wave survey study in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2): e051867. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051867

67. Yates S.W. Physician Stress and Burnout. The American journal of medicine. 2020; 133(2): 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.034

68. Han S., Shanafelt T.D., Sinsky C.A., et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019; 170(11): 784–90.

69. Patel R., Bachu R., Adikey A., Malik M., Shah M. Factors related to physician burnout and its consequences: a review. Behav Sci. 2018; 8(11): 98.

70. Maslach C. Burnout: The Cost of Caring. Malor Books: Cambridge, MA, USA; 2003.

71. Health & Safety Executive. The Health and Occupation Research Network 2012 Report. Types of Ill Health in the UK. https://clck.ru/35Cu4Z (19 December 2013, date last accessed).

72. Health & Safety Executive. Index of Data Tables. https://clck.ru/35CtvW (24 September 2014, date last accessed).

73. University of Manchester Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH). The Health and Occupational Research Network (THOR). http://www.populationhealth.manchester.ac.uk/epidemiology/COEH/research/thor/ (24 September 2014, date last accessed).

74. Milhem M., Kalichman L., Ezra D., Alperovitch-Najenson D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: A comprehensive narrative review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2016; 29(5): 735–47. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00620

75. Milushkina O.Y., Skoblina N.A., Markelova S.V., Popov V.I., Sokolova N.V. The use of electronic devices by students, parents and teachers before and after the transition to distant learning. Vestnik RGMU. 2020; (3): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2020.037

76. Popov M.V., Libina I.I., Melikhova E.P. Assessment of the influence of gadgets on the psycho-emotional state of students. Molodyozhnyj innovacionnyj vestnik. 2019; 8(2): 676–678 (in Russian).

77. Rugulies R., Aust B., Madsen I.E. Effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2017; 43(4): 294–306.

78. Malik S., Blake H., Batt M. How healthy are our nurses? New and registered nurses compared. Br. J. Nurs. 2011; 20(8): 489–96. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.8.489


Review

For citations:


Kaminer D.D., Milushkina O.Yu., Sheina N.I., Bulatseva M.B., Girina M.D., Paleeva M.F. Digitalization of healthcare and health status of medical workers. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2023;63(8):490-502. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-490-502. EDN: kqqycs

Views: 747


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1026-9428 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)