Heart rate variability assessment during work in personal protective equipment under environmental thermal load

Introduction. When performing work in open areas in the summer, electrical engineering personnel use shunt shielding kits to protect against industrial frequency electric fields. However, the use of personal protective equipment has an additional thermal load on the human body, which is assessed, among other things, by changes in the indicators of the functional state of the cardiovascular system.

The study aims to assess the variability of the heart rate when working in shunting screening kits under conditions of modeling the thermal load of the environment.

Materials and methods. The study carried out in seven volunteers using power frequency electric field personal protective equipment. Heart rate variability assessed for simulated elevated thermal load environment. The volunteers worked with physical activity (walking) of 60 minutes treadmill and 15 minutes rest in the same climatic conditions (recovery period) after. Temperature and humidity inside shunting shielding personal suit recorded. The determination and statistical analysis of heart rate variability based in electrocardiogram were performed. Based on the recording of an electrocardiogram, the authors carried out the determination and statistical analysis of heart rate variability indicators.

Results. Volunteers heart rate variability analysis showed that stress index median values during work and recovery periods were 345 cu and 96 cu without shunting shielding personal suit. Work in shunting shielding personal suit showed that stress index median values were 196 cu and in recovery period 152 cu. RR-interval median values under work in personal protective equipment were lower (0.552 s) than without personal protective equipment (0.617 s). The results revealed the tendency to body thermoregulatory mechanisms strain increase in work time, characterized by RR-intervals differences with personal protective equipment use and without (ΔRR) — 0.057 s, and organism partial recovery during rest time (ΔRR — 0.113 s) with personal protective equipment.

Limitations. The number of volunteers was due to the limited duration of the study.

Conclusion. The results of cardiovascular system functional state assessment by heart rate variability indicate stress with regulatory systems overstrain with and without personal protective equipment. Power frequency electric field personal protective equipment makes additional external thermal load to human body as stress index (196 cu), RR-intervals (0.552 s) in work period and slight decrease in recovery period (152 cu and 0.566 s). Stress index high values in the recovery period associated with prolonged environment thermal load exposure due to climatic parameters and volunteers staying in PPE after the end of physical work.

Ethics. The Local Ethics Committee of the Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health approved this study carried out under the WMA Declaration of Helsinki (record № 3 from 23.03.2022).

Contribution:
Perov S.Yu. — concept, design and organization of research;
Sazhina M.V. — collecting material and data processing, writing tex;
Konshina T.A. — collecting material and data processing, writing text;
Levchenkov D.I. — data processing, text writing.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 24.04.2023 / Accepted: 25.04.2023 / Published: 05.05.2023

1. Marchand M., Gin K. The Cardiovascular System in Heat Stroke. CJC Open. 2021; 4(2): 158–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.10.002

2. Donaldson G.C., Keatinge W.R., Saunders R.D. Cardiovascular responses to heat stress and their adverse consequences in healthy and vulnerable human populations. Int J Hyperthermia. 2003; 19(3): 225–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265673021000058357

3. Bayevskiy R.M., Ivanov G.G., Chireykin L.V., Gavrilushkin A.P., Dovgalevskiy P.Ya., Kukushkin Yu.A. et al. Analysis of heart rate variability using various electrocardiographic systems (Part 1). Vestnik aritmologii. 2001; 24: 65–87 (in Russian).

4. Hodyrev G.N., Hlybova S.V., Cirkin V.I., Dmitrieva S.L. Methodological aspects of the analysis of temporal and spectral parameters of heart rate variability (literature review). Vyatskij medicinskij vestnik. 2011; 3–4: 60–70 (in Russian).

5. Spicin A.P. Analysis of correlations of heart rate variability parameters in patients with arterial hypertension. Klinicheskaya fiziologiya krovoobrashcheniya. 2017; 14(3): 146–51. https://doi.org/10.24022/18146910-2017-14-3-146-151 (in Russian).

6. Novikov E.M., Steblecov S.V., Ardashev V.N., Kirillova T.B., Tarabarina N.B. Methods for studying heart rate according to ECG data: heart rate variability and dispersion mapping (review article). Kremlevskaya medicina. Klinicheskij vestnik. 2019; 4: 81–9. https://doi.org/10.26269/4t6g-mx35 (in Russian).

7. Marshutin N.A., Semionenkova N.V., Yankovaya T.N. Heart rate variability in patients with chronic heart failure with changes in preload. Novaya nauka: teoreticheskij i prakticheskij vzglyad. 2017; 1(3): 5–8 (in Russian).

8. GOST 12.4.172-2019 System of labor safety standards. Means of individual protection against electric fields of industrial frequency. Individual shielding kits. General technical requirements. Test methods. M.: Standartinform; 2019 (in Russian).

9. Burmistrova O.V., Perov S.Yu., Konshina T.A. Evaluation of personal protective equipment type EP-4 (0) in terms of the thermal state of a person. Gigiyena i sanitariya. 2021; 100(3): 229–33. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-3-229-233 (in Russian).

10. Korpinen L.H., Elovaara J.A., Kuisti H.A. Occupational exposure to electric fields and induced currents associated with 400 kV substation tasks from different service platforms. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011; 32(1): 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20612

11. Li L., Xiong D., Liu J., Li Z., Zeng G., Li H. No effects of power line frequency extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure on selected neurobehavior tests of workers inspecting transformers and distribution line stations versus controls. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2014; 37: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0237-6

12. Goiceanu C., Danulescu R. Occupational Exposure to Power Frequency Fields in Some Electrical Transformation Stations in Romania. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2015; 12(2): 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2006.11076676

13. Poirier M.P., Meade R.D., McGinn R., Friesen B.J., Hardcastle S.G., Flouris A.D., Kenny G.P. The Influence of Arc-Flash and Fire-Resistant Clothing on Thermoregulation during Exercise in the Heat. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015; 12(9): 654–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1029615

14. Vargas N., Chapman C., Johnson B., Gathercole R., Schlader Z. Skin wettedness is an important contributor to thermal behavior during exercise and recovery. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2018; 315. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00178.2018

15. SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors for humans. M.: Tsentrmag; 2021 (in Russian)

16. GOST R 56323-2014. National standard of the Russian Federation. Medical electrical products. Holter monitoring systems. Technical requirements for public procurement.: introduction date 01.01.2016. M.: Standartinform; 2015 (in Russian)

17. Khodyrev G.N., Khlybova S.V., Tsirkin V.I., Dmitriyeva S.L. Methodological aspects of the analysis of temporal and spectral parameters of heart rate variability (Literature review). Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik. 2011; 3–4: 60–70 (in Russian)

18. Yamamoto S., Iwamoto M., Inoue M., Harada N. Evaluation of the effect of heat exposure on the autonomic nervous system by heart rate variability and urinary catecholamines. J Occup Health. 2007; 49(3): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.49.199.

19. Abellán-Aynés O., Manonelles P., Alacid F. Cardiac Parasympathetic Withdrawal and Sympathetic Activity: Effect of Heat Exposure on Heart Rate Variability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11): 5934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115934

20. Carrillo A.E., Flouris A.D., Herry C.L., Poirier M.P., Boulay P., Dervis S. et al. Heart rate variability during high heat stress: a comparison between young and older adults with and without Type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016; 311(4): 669–75. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00176.2016