The excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss numerical assessment scale

Relevance. In the new edition of the Labor Code (as amended on 02.25.2022), risk-oriented approaches to management in the field of labor protection are fixed, which necessitated the revision of regulatory and methodological documents, including in the field of occupational medicine based on the methodology for assessing occupational risk to workers' health.

The study aims to substantiate and develop a numerical scale for assessing the group attributive risk of hearing loss from exposure to industrial noise.

Materials and methods. The authors have carried out an expert-analytical study of materials on qualitative and quantitative a priori and a posteriori assessment of occupational risk.

Results. The scientists have confirmed the advantage of attributive risk over other indicators for assessing the risk of hearing loss from noise. The numerical scale of the assessment of the attributive risk of hearing loss in relation to the risk-oriented hygienic classification of working conditions and the assessment of the relationship of hearing impairment from noise with work, depending on the magnitude of the attributive risk and etiological proportion, is substantiated. We have justified the categorization of the attributive risk of hearing.

Limitations. Features of the model for assessing hearing loss due to noise exposure according to GOST R ISO 1999:2017.

Conclusion. The development of a quantitative scale for assessing the attributive risk of hearing loss not only harmonizes the hygienic assessment of the noise risk factor with international practice, but also contributes to the development of the methodology for assessing and managing occupational risk.

Ethics. In preparing the article, the authors were guided by the Ethical principles of medical research set out in the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association of the last revision.

Contribution:
Prokopenko L.V. — concept and design of the study, editing;
Courierov N.N. — concept and design of the study, analysis of normative and methodological documentation, calculations and analysis of results, writing the text;
Lagutina A.V. — analysis of normative and methodological documentation, editing.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 20.03.2023 / Accepted: 24.03.2023 / Published: 10.04.2023

1. Prokopenko L.V., Kuryerov N.N., Lagutina A.V., Pochtareva E.S. Determination and assessment of the group excess (attributive) risk of hearing loss from noise. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2019; 59(4): 212–9.

2. Prokopenko L.V., Kuryerov N.N., Lagutina A.V., Pochtareva E.S. Substantiation of risk-oriented hygienic criteria and classification of working conditions by noise, taking into account the group attributive (excessive) risk of hearing loss. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2022; 62(3): 185–92.

3. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I., Kuryerov N.N., Prokopenko L.V., Bulgakova M.V., Khakhileva O.O. Improvement of criteria for hearing loss from noise and assessment of occupational risk. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2018; 4: 1–9.

4. Prokopenko L.V., Kuryerov N.N., Lagutina A.V. Excessive risk of hearing loss from noise: the problem of choosing indicators and criteria. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2020; 85(6): 27–33.

5. American academy of otolaryngology & head and neck surgery foundation, Inc. Otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Alexandria, VA; 1997.

6. ILO. Guidelines on the medical examinations of seafarers (ILO/IMO/JMS/2011/12). Geneva: ILO; 2013.

7. Guidelines for the hygienic assessment of the factors of the working environment and the labor process. Criteria and classification of working conditions. Moscow: Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor; 2005.

8. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union 2003/10/EC of 6 February 2003 on minimum requirements for the health and safety of workers with regard to risks associated with physical exposure (noise) (The seventeenth separate Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). https://base.garant.ru/70205142/

9. Occupational Noise Exposure Revised Criteria 1998. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, Ohio; 1998.

10. Denisov E.I., Chesalin P.V. Nonspecific effects of noise exposure. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2007; 6: 54–6.

11. Denisov E.I. Numerical scale for work-relatedness assessment of a disease. Abstr. 14th Int. Conf. epidemiol. in occup. Health (EPICOH-1999). Herzliya, Israel, October 10-14; 1999.

12. Guidelines for assessing occupational health risks for employees. Organizational and methodological foundations, principles and evaluation criteria: Manual. Moscow: Federal Center of State Sanitary and Epidemiological Supervision of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2004.

13. Denisov E.I. Noise in the workplace: MRLs, risk assessment and hearing loss prediction. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2018; 3: 13–23.

14. Stayner L. Methodologic and ethical issues in epidemiologic risk assessment of occupational hazards. EPICOH 14th International Conference on Epidemiology in Occupational Health, Herzliya, Israel, October 10–14, 1999. Rome, Italy: International Commission on Occupational Health, 1999 Oct: 57–8. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nioshtic-2/20027171.html

15. Occupational health risk for workers. Eds. N.F. Izmerov, E.I. Denisov. Moscow: Trovant; 2003.

16. Zaitseva N.V., Shur P.Z., Alekseev V.B., Savochkina A.A., Savochkin A.I., Khrushcheva E.V. Methodological approaches to assessing the categories of occupational risk caused by various types of health disorders of workers associated with a complex of factors of the working environment and the labor process. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2022; 4: 23–30.

17. Izmerov N.F., Kaptsov V.A., Denisov E.I., Ovakimov V.G. The problem of occupational risk assessment in occupational medicine. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 1993; 3–4: 1–4.

18. Izmerov N.F., Kaptsov V.A., Ovakimov V.G., Denisov E.I. The concept of assessing occupational diseases by risk and severity categories. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 1993; 9–10: 1–3.

19. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I., Molodkina N.N. Fundamentals of health damage risk management in occupational medicine. Gigiena truda i professional’nye zabolevanija. 1998; 3: 1.

20. Basharova G.R., Denisov E.P., Bakirov A.B., Karamova L.M. Occupational conditionality of health disorders as a measure of occupational risk. Life safety. Occupational and environmental protection. 2000; 2000: 5960.

21. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I. Occupational risk assessment in occupational medicine: principles, methods and criteria. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk. 2004; 2: 17–21.

22. Suter A.H. Standards and Regulations in 47. Noise, Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, International Labor Organization, Geneva; 2011.