Development and implementation of a concept for substitution of the highly hazardous substances with safe chemical alternatives

Introduction. The concept of chemical substitution is now increasingly included in policy and regulatory efforts around the world to reduce the risks of chemicals to human health and the environment, as well as in industry initiatives for the sustainable management of chemicals. With the exception of conventional substances regulated by EEC documents, unfortunately, there is no legislatively established mechanism for identifying, banning and limiting the production and consumption of highly hazardous chemical compounds in the Russian Federation.

The purpose of the research is to develop and scientifically substantiate the concept of replacing highly hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives.

Materials and methods. The guidelines and recommendations of the OECD, WHO, ILO, FAO, UNEP, as well as regulatory and methodological documents of the EU, the USA, Canada and other states on the criteria for classifying substances as highly hazardous, organizing and monitoring them in environmental objects and selection of safe chemical alternatives were studied and analyzed.

Results. The concept of substitution includes the scientific substantiation of the criteria for classifying substances as highly hazardous, the organization and generalization of data from monitoring the human environment and the circulation of hazardous chemical products on the market, the development of a list of highly hazardous chemicals that are priority for regulation; selection of safe alternatives and their comparative analysis, taking into account the assessment of the advantages of the alternative over the existing technology/substance, implementation of management decisions.

The criteria for identifying substances of highly concern and selecting their alternatives are the following indicators: biological activity (carcinogens, mutagens, reprotoxicants class 1A and 1B in accordance with GHS, endocrine disruptors); stability in the environment; bioaccumulative potential; the possibility of cross-media transfer; aquatic toxicity (acute and chronic toxicity of hazard class 1 in accordance with GHS); production volumes (volumes of emissions and discharges); number of contacts.

Conclusion. The analysis of the international practice of regulating highly hazardous chemicals indicates the need to implement at the national level and within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union a program for the systematic monitoring of high-risk chemicals circulating on the market in order to withdraw them from circulation and replace them with safe analogues.

Implementation of the concept of replacing highly hazardous substances with safe chemical alternatives allows to create a draft national list of banned and restricted highly hazardous chemicals relevant to various industries (food, materials, basic chemistry).

Contribution:
Khamidulina Kh.Kh. — concept and design of the study, editing, approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article;
Proskurina A.S. — collection and processing of material, writing the text;
Tarasova E.V. — research concept, editing.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest

Funding. The study was funded by the state program "Ensuring the chemical and biological safety of the Russian Federation".

Received: 01.12.2022 / Accepted: 06.12.2022 / Published: 12.12.2022

1. Guidance on Key Considerations for the Identification and Selection of Safer Chemical Alternatives Series on Risk Management No. 60. 2021.

2. Processes and challenges in the substitution of harmful chemicals. Available at: https://www.greenfacts.org/en/substitution-chemicals/l-2/index.htm

3. An NGO Guide to SAICM. Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management. A Framework for Action to Protect Human Health and the Environment from Toxic Chemicals. Jack Weinberg. "ECO-Consent" translation ed. O.A. Speranskaya. Available at: www.ecoaccord.org

4. Chemicals in products. Available at: www.saicmknovledge.org

5. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Synthesis Report: OECD Workshop on Approaches to Support Substitution and Alternatives Assessmen. Series on Risk Management. No. 51. Paris: 2019. www.oecd.org

6. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

7. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP).

8. Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.

9. Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work.

10. Directive 98/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work.

11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). USA, Washington. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/

12. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Adopted 22.05.2001. Available at: www.un.org

13. The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer. Adopted 03.22.1985. Available at: www.un.org

14. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Adopted 16.09.1987. Available at: www.un.org

15. The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. Adopted 22.03.1989. www.basel.int

16. The Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. Adopted 10.09.1998. www.pic.int

17. The Minamata Convention on Mercury. Adopted 10.10.2013. www.mercuryconvention.org

18. Human Health Risk Assessment from Environmental Chemicals. Р 2.1.10.1920-04. Approved by Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation G.G. Onishchenko; 2004 (in Russian).

19. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). Eighth revised edition. United Nations New York and Geneva; 2019.

20. The 2004 OECD List of High Production Volume Chemicals. www.oecd.org

21. Amirova, Z.K., & Speranskaya, O.A. New persistent organic supertoxicants and their impact on human health. Moscow 2016 (in Russian).

22. The Global Chemicals Outlook II 2019. Available at: www.unep.org

23. Zaitseva N.V., May I.V., Kiryanov D.A., Goryaev D.V., Klein S.V. Socio-hygienic monitoring at the present stage: state and development prospects in conjunction with risk-based surveillance. Analiz riska zdorovyu. 2016; 4: 4–16 (in Russian).

24. Ovchinnikova E.L., Fridman K.B., Novikov Yu.A. Tasks of social and hygienic monitoring in the new legal conditions. Zdorov'e — osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. 2018; 13: 2 (in Russian).

25. Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment COM (2020) 667 final Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

26. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 185 Guidance Document for Exposure Assessment based on Environmental Monitoring. Paris, 2013. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2013)7&doclanguage=en)

27. Proskurina A.S., Khamidulina Kh.Kh., Tarasova E.V. International approaches to reducing the risk of highly hazardous chemicals exposure on human health and to the selection criteria for substitution by safer analogues (literature review). Toksikologichesky vestnik. 2022; 30(2): 68–74 (in Russian).