The role of quality of life indicators in the assessment of professional burnout syndrome in different categories of workers
Leonid A. Strizhakov,
Svetlana V. Kuzmina,
Sergey A. Babanov,
Denis V. Vinnikov,
Natalia A. Ostryakova https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-10-686-689
Abstract
The organization of work of workers of various professions associated with intense and quite often intense interpersonal communication is an object of increasingly active attention. This applies to medical professionals. Medical workers experience psycho-emotional overload, which can lead to diseases, a decrease in the quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic has particularly acute the problem of professional burnout syndrome among medical workers. The article discusses the role of quality of life indicators in assessing the syndrome of professional burnout in different categories of workers. Professional burnout syndrome is a significant and relevant medical and social problem, and aspects related to the quality of life can considerably impact the risk of developing professional burnout syndrome.
About the Authors
Leonid A. Strizhakov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Center for Occupational Pathology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Professor of the Department of Internal, Occupational Diseases and Rheumatology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Dr. of Sci. (Med.)., Professor.
e-mail: strizhakov76@mail.ru
Svetlana V. Kuzmina
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Babanov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Denis V. Vinnikov
Al-Farabi National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Natalia A. Ostryakova
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. ICD-11. International classification of diseases 11 revision. The global standard for diagnostic health information.
2. Long COVID-19. Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
3. Bukhtiyarov I.V. Professional burnout and assessment criteria. Analytical review. I.V. Bukhtiyarov, M.Yu. Rubtsov. Vestnik Natsional'nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo TSentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014; 9(2): 106–11.
4. Garipova R.V., Berkheeva Z.M., Kuzmina S.V. Assessment of the likelihood of the formation of professional burnout syndrome in medical workers. Bulletin of modern clinical medicine. 2015; 8(2): 10–5.
5. Kuzmina S.V., Garipova R.V. Mental health of workers. Topical issues. Review. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2020; 60(4): 250–7. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-4-250-257
6. New coronavirus infection COVID-19: professional aspects of maintaining the health and safety of medical workers. Guidelines. Edited by I.V. Bukhtiyarova, Yu.Yu. Gorblyansky. M.: AMT, FGBNU "NII MT"; 2021.
7. Global Burden of Disease 2019. The Lancet. https://www.thelancet.com/infographics/gbd-2019 (Accessed 18.10.2021).
8. ICD-10. International Classification of Diseases 10 revision. https://mkb-10.com/
9. Golenkov A.V. Modern principles of therapy and rehabilitation of the mentally ill. Materials of the Russian Conference: Plenum of the Board of the Russian Society of Psychiatrists: With the participation of chief psychiatrists and narcologists, heads of psychiatric and narcological institutions. Responsible editor: V.N. Krasnov Collection of conference abstracts. Publishing house "Medpraktika-M". Moscow; 2006.
10. Dubitskaya E.A. The impact of stigma on the interaction of specialists in the primary health care network. Materials of the Russian conference: Modern principles of therapy and rehabilitation of the mentally ill. Moscow; 2006.
11. Shmilovich A.A. Psychopathology of Russian students of the XXI century. — XVII Congress of Russian Psychiatrists in conjunction with the International Congress of the World Psychiatric Association "Interdisciplinary approach to the comorbidity of mental disorders on the way to integrative treatment", abstracts edited by N.G. Neznanova. St. Petersburg; 2021. https://psychiatr.ru/events/833
12. Gorblyansky Yu.Yu., Ponamareva O.P., Kontorovich E.P. The main predictors of professional burnout among teachers. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2019; 50(9): 605–6.
13. Vinnikov D., Tulekov Z., Akylzhanov A. et al. Age and work duration do not predict burnout in firefighters. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6643-2
14. Vinnikov D., Romanova Z., Kapanova G. et al. Testosterone and occupational burnout in professional male firefighters. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10446-z
15. Vinnikov D., Romanova Z., Ussatayeva G. et al. Occupational burnout in oncologists in Kazakhstan. Occupational Medicine (London). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab121
16. Vinnikov D., Dushpanova A., Kodasbaev A. et al. Occupational burnout and lifestyle in Kazakhstan cardiologists. Archives of Public Health. 2019; 77: 13.
Review
For citations:
Strizhakov L.A., Kuzmina S.V., Babanov S.A., Vinnikov D.V., Ostryakova N.A. The role of quality of life indicators in the assessment of professional burnout syndrome in different categories of workers. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(10):686-689. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-10-686-689
Views:
470
Email this article 
