Improving the performance of filters for personal respiratory protection
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-8-497-502
Abstract
Introduction. To adequately protect workers from gaseous air pollution using air purifying respiratory protective devices (RPD), it is necessary to periodically replace filters.
The aim of the study was the analyze the methods of monitoring the performance of workers’ RPD.
Materials and methods. Nowadays the subjective reaction of smell to an increase in the concentration of gas in the mask is widely used. This practice is compared with the available scientific information on the subjective ability of humans to detect gases.
Results. The requirements for filter replacement in the legislation of foreign countries are analyzed. It has been established that for most hazardous substances there is no available information on the thresholds of odor (irritant) perception, and the available data show a high probability of exceeding the odor perception thresholds over the maximum permissible concentrations of hazardous substances in the working area. for getting used to it, distraction of attention, low individual sensitivity, etc. The existing approach in Russia leads to the belated replacement of part of the filters and, as a consequence, to the deterioration of the professional health of workers.
Conclusion. Recommendations are formulated on the measures, the implementation of which is necessary to improve the protection of personnel used air purifying RPD.
About the Authors
Valery A. Kaptsov
All-Russian Research Institute Hygiene of transport the Federal Service for the Oversight of Consumer Protection and Welfare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of occupational health department, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, corresponding member of RAS.
e-mail: kapcovva39@mail.ru
Alexander V. Chirkin
LTD "Beta PRO"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. J.E. Cometto-Muftiz & W.S. Cain. Relative Sensitivity of the Ocular Trigeminal, Nasal Trigeminal and Olfactory Systems to Airborne Chemicals. Chem. Senses. 1995; 20(2): 191–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/20.2.191
2. M.H. Abraham, J. Andonian-Haftvan, J.E. Cometto-Muñiz & W.S. Cain. An Analysis of Nasal Irritation Thresholds Using a New Solvation Equation. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1996; 31(1): 71–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/31.1.71
3. M.H. Abraham, R. Kumarsingh, J.E. Cometto-Muniz, W.S. Cain. Draize Eye Scores and Eye Irritation Thresholds in Man Combined into one Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship. Toxicology in Vitro. 1998; 12(4): 403–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(98)00010-1
4. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. In: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/default.html (Accessed 05 March 2021).
5. J.H. Ruth. Odor Thresholds and Irritation Levels of Several Chemical Substances: A Review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986; 47(3): A142–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668691389595
6. Kaptsov V.A., Chirkin A.V. Timely replacement of respirator cartridges. Available at: https://ru.wikibooks.org/wiki/Замена_противогазных_фильтров_СИЗОД_(лекция) (Accessed 05 March 2021) (in Russian).
7. S.S. Murnane A.H. Lehocky, P.D. Owens eds. Odor Thresholds for Chemicals with Established Occupational Health Standards. 2nd ed. Falls Church, Virginia: American Industrial Hygiene Association; 2013.
8. Stevens J.C., Cain W.S., Burke R.J. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chem Senses. 1988; 13(4): 643–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/13.4.643
9. Mayorov V.A. The odors, their perception, effects, and elimination. М.; 2006 (in Russian).
10. P. Dalton, B. Cowart, D. Dilks, M. Gould, P.S.J. Lees, A. Stefaniak et al. Olfactory function in workers exposed to styrene in the reinforced-plastics industry. Am J Ind Med. 2003; 44(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10102
11. J.E. Amoore, D. Venstrom, A.R. Davis. Measurement of specific anosmia. Percept Motor Skills. 1968; 26(1): 143–64. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1968.26.1.143.
12. R.G. Adams, N. Crabtree. Anosmia in Alkaline Battery Workers. Br J Ind Med. 1961; 18(3): 216–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.18.3.216
13. M.I. Greenberg, J.A. Curtis & D. Vearrier. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception. Clinical Toxicology. 2013: 51(2): 70–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2013.767908
14. Shkrabo M.L. ed. The industrial gas masks & respirators. Cherkassy; 1982 (in Russian).
15. Yu.G. Sorokin (ed.). The selection and usage of respirators. M; 2006 (in Russian).
16. Basmanov P.I., Kaminsky S.L., Korobeinikova A.V., Trubitsyna M.E. Respiratory protective devices. SPb; 2002 (in Russian).
17. Respiratory Protection eTool. Respirator Change Schedules. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/respiratory/change_schedule.html (Accessed 05 March 2021).
18. Roukavishnikov V.S., Kolycheva I.V. Industrial hygiene for firemen: results and prospects of research. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2007; 6: 1–5.
19. Meshkov Nikolay A., Bukhtiyarov Igor V., Valtseva Elena A. Occupational risk factors and physical condition of firefighters. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2020; 10: 658–73. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-10-658-673
20. Bukhtiyarov I.V. Сurrent state and main directions of preservation and strengthening of health of the working population of Russia. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2019; 9: 527–32. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-9-527-532
Review
For citations:
Kaptsov V.A., Chirkin A.V. Improving the performance of filters for personal respiratory protection. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(8):497-502. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-8-497-502
Views:
579
Email this article 
