Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to aerosols containing nanoparticles: inflammation and phenotype features
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-8-488-496
Abstract
Introduction. Influence of incidental nanoparticles of industrial aerosols on occupational lung diseases development is not studied enough. As nanoparticles has properties to induce inflammation and fibrosis, it is hypothesized that they affect occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotype.
The aim was to establish monocyte subsets, airway inflammation, clinical and functional features in occupational COPD due to aerosols containing nanoparticles exposure.
Materials and methods. Study design was a single center prospective cohort observational. Subjects with occupational COPD (GOLD 2011–2021 criteria) exposed to aerosols containing nanoparticles (n=50) enrolled. Comparison group — COPD in tobacco smokers (n=50), control group — healthy people (n=50). Groups were matched by demographics and COPD duration. Nanoparticles at workplaces air were measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry and by scanning electron microscopy. Of participants 26 were exposed to maximal concentrations of metal nanoparticles and 24 — of silica nanoparticles. Spirography, body pletysmography, lung diffusing capacity (DLco/Va), Doppler-ehocardiography, induced sputum cytology, COPD exacerbations assessment were done. Monocyte subsets were determined by flow cytometry. Linear regression model was used to explore relationships.
Results. COPD due to aerosols containing metal nanoparticles was characterized by most severe airflow limitation, lung hyperinflation, pulmonary hypertension, most prominent decrease in DLco/Va, frequent and severe COPD exacerbations, eosinophilic inflammation. The largest proportion of «classical» CD14+CD16– monocytes subset, 96,4% (90,3%; 97,2%), high level of CCR5 expression were seen in this group. The features of COPD due to aerosols containing silica nanoparticles were substantial decrease in DLco/Vа, the least airflow limitation, mild lung hyperinflation, rare COPD exacerbations, paucigranulocytic inflammation. The largest proportion of «non-classical» CD14DimCD16+ monocytes with high level of CCR2 expression revealed. Mass concentration of metal nanoparticles was associated with «classical» monocytes, (В=1,5), silica nanoparticles — with «non-classical» monocytes (В=1,4). On their turn, «classical» monocytes were associated with DLco (В=–1,6), functional residual volume (В=1,2), mean pulmonary artery pressure (В=–1,4), eosinophilic inflammation. «Non-classical» monocytes were associated with DLco (В=–1,5) and paucigranulocytic inflammation (В=1,2), р<0,015.
Conclusions. Exposure of incidental nanoparticles was associated with circulated monocyte subsets, airway inflammation and occupaitonal CODP phenotype.
About the Authors
Marina A. ZenkovaRussian Federation
Head of the Laboratory of Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids, Chief Researcher, Dr. of Sci. (Biol.)., professor.
e-mail: marzen@niboch.nsc.ru
Anatoly I. Saprykin
Russian Federation
Evgeniya B. Logashenko
Russian Federation
Ilya S. Shpagin
Russian Federation
Olga S. Kotova
Russian Federation
Alfiya R. Tsygankova
Russian Federation
Galina V. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Anikina
Russian Federation
Natalya V. Kamneva
Russian Federation
Dmitriy A. Gerasimenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Bukhtiyarov I.V. Current state and main directions of preservation and strengthening of health of the working population of Russia. Med. truda i prom ekol. 2019; (9): 527–532. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-9-527-532 (in Russian).
2. On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in the year 2020: State Report. Moscow, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; 2021 (in Russian).
3. Fatkhutdinova L.M., Khaliullin T.O., Zalyalov R.R., Tkachev A.G., Birch M.E., Shvedova A.A. Assessment of Airborn Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in a Manufactoring Environment. Nanotechnol Russ. 2016; 11(1): 110–16. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078016010055 (in Russian).
4. Sarwar F., Malik R.N., Chow C.W., Alam K. Occupational exposure and consequent health impairments due to potential incidental nanoparticles in leather tanneries: An evidential appraisal of south Asian developing countries. Environ Int. 2018; 117: 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.051
5. Zhang S., Gao H., Bao G. Physical Principles of Nanoparticle Cellular Endocytosis. ACS Nano. 2015; 9(9): 8655–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03184
6. Shvedova A.A., Yanamala N., Kisin E.R., Khailullin T.O., Birch M.E., Fatkhutdinova L.M. Integrated Analysis of Dysregulated ncRNA and mRNA Expression Profiles in Humans Exposed to Carbon Nanotubes. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3): e0150628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150628
7. Mo Y., Jiang M., Zhang Y., Wan R., Li J., Zhong C.J. et al. Comparative mouse lung injury by nickel nanoparticles with differential surface modification. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019; 17(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0436-0
8. Gliga A.R., Di Bucchianico S., Lindvall J., Fadeel B., Karlsson H.L. RNA-sequencing reveals long-term effects of silver nanoparticles on human lung cells. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 6668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25085-5
9. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021 report. Available from URL.: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GOLD-REPORT-2021-v1.1-25Nov20_WMV.pdf Assessed 13.07.2021
10. Aisanov Z.R., Avdeev S.N., Arkhipov V.V., Belevskiy A.S., Leshchenko I.V., Ovcharenko S.I., Shmelev E.I., Chuchalin A.G. National clinical guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical decision-making algorithm. Pulmonologiya. 2017; 27(1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2017-27-1-13-20 (in Russian).
11. Chuchalin A.G., Aysanov Z.R., Chikina S.Yu., Chernyak A.V., Kalmanova E.N. Federal guidelines of Russian Respiratory Society on spirometry. Pulmonologiya. 2014; (6): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2014-0-6-11-24 (in Russian).
12. Graham B.L., Steenbruggen I., Miller M.R., Barjaktarevic I.Z., Cooper B.G., Hall G.L. et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019; 200(8): e70–e88. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST
13. Savushkina O.I., Chernyak A.V. Clinical utility of body plethysmography. Atmosfera. Pulmonologiya i allergologiya. 2013; 2: 38–41.
14. Graham B.L., Brusasco V., Burgos F., Cooper B.G., Jensen R., Kendrick A. et al. 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 3; 49(1): 1600016.
15. Pavord I.D., Lettis S., Anzueto A., Barnes N. Blood eosinophil count and pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016; 4(9): 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30148-5
16. Haldar P., Pavord I.D. Noneosinophilic asthma: a distinct clinical and pathologic phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 119(5): 1043–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.042
17. Lutsenko L.A., Rakitskiy V.N., Il'nitskaya A.V., Egorova A.M., Gvozdeva L.L. Features of nano aerosols action and safety measures. Med. truda i prom ekol. 2016; (3): 6–11 (in Russian).
18. Pelclova D., Zdimal V., Komarc M., Vlckova S., Fenclova Z., Ondracek J. et al. Deep Airway Inflammation and Respiratory Disorders in Nanocomposite Workers. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018; 8(9): 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8090731
19. Han H., Park Y.H., Park H.J., Lee K., Um K., Park J.W. et al. Toxic and adjuvant effects of silica nanoparticles on ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation in mice. Respir Res. 2016; 17(1): 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0376-x
20. Afroz T., Hiraku Y., Ma N., Ahmed S., Oikawa S., Kawanishi S. et al. Nitrative DNA damage in cultured macrophages exposed to indium oxide. J Occup Health. 2018; 60(2): 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.17-0146-OA
21. Kapellos T.S., Bonaguro L., Gemünd I., Reusch N., Saglam A., Hinkley E.R. et al. Human Monocyte Subsets and Phenotypes in Major Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 2035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02035
22. Cornwell W.D., Kim V., Fan X., Vega M.E., Ramsey F.V., Criner G.J. et al. Activation and polarization of circulating monocytes in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med. 2018; 18(1): 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0664-y
23. Shpagina L.A., Kotova O.S., Saraskina L.E., Ermakova M.A. Peculiarities of cellular and molecular mechanisms of occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sibirskoe medicinskoj obozrenie. 2018; 2(110): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.20333/2500136-2018-2-37-4524 (in Russian).
24. Costa C., Traves S.L., Tudhope S.J., Fenwick P.S., Belchamber K.B., Russell R.E. et al. Enhanced monocyte migration to CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2016 Apr; 47(4): 1093–102. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01642-2015
Review
For citations:
Zenkova M.A., Saprykin A.I., Logashenko E.B., Shpagin I.S., Kotova O.S., Tsygankova A.R., Kuznetsova G.V., Anikina E.V., Kamneva N.V., Gerasimenko D.A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to aerosols containing nanoparticles: inflammation and phenotype features. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(8):488-496. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-8-488-496