Features of electromagnetic and noise environment in the workplace of the staff of MRI departments: problems of hygienic regulation and control

Introduction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most dynamically developing, high-tech diagnostic methods. At the same time, the specific features of the electromagnetic environment and noise exposures at the medical and technical personnel operating and maintaining MRI workplaces are not well understood and are currently not taken into account when conducting a hygienic assessment of working condition in the Russian Federation.

The aim of study is scientific substantiation of the need to improve the hygienic assessment of electromagnetic and noise conditions in the workplace of the staff of MRI departments.

Materials and methods. An analytical method to evaluate the current domestic and foreign regulatory and methodological documents that determine the hygienic assessment requirements for electromagnetic environment and noise in MRI departments was used. More than 4 thousand measurements of the intensity of electromagnetic fields and noise in 88 rooms in Moscow equipped with different types of MRI (from 0,1 mT to 3 T) and studies of the performing duration various types of work and electromagnetic field and noise exposure on personnel was done. The amplitude-time and frequency parameters of the variables of the electromagnetic field (EMF) and sound pressure detailed studies have been carried out.

Results. Significant differences in controlled indicators, acceptable exposure levels, and control methods has revealed by critical analysis of domestic and foreign hygienic regulatory and methodological documents. The studies showed that the medical and technical personnel of MRI departments are exposed with high spatial and temporal gradients static magnetic fields and extreme levels of noise during diagnostic work in the immediate vicinity of the tomograph magnet. The presence of time-varying magnetic fields in a wide range of low frequencies and radio frequencies having a complicated (pulsed) waveform is a feature of the electromagnetic environment in MRI. New standardized control parameters and limit levels for low-frequency ranges magnetic fields for their adequate hygienic assessment are proposed.

Conclusion. The studies made it possible to substantiate the proposals the improving of electromagnetic field and noise hygienic assessment at the MRI staff workplaces.

1. McRobbie D.W. Occupational exposure in MRI. Br. J. Radiol. 2012; 85(1012): 293–312. https://doi.org/ 10.1259/bjr/30146162

2. Stikova E. Magnetic resonance imaging safety: principles and guidelines. Maced. Acad. Sci. Arts Sect. Biol. Med. Sci. 2012; 33: 441–72.

3. Karpowicz J., Gryz K. Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to a Magnetic Field From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Devices. Int. J. of Occ. Saf. and Ergon. 2006; 12(2): 155–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2006.11076679

4. Kim S.J., Kim K.A. Safety issues and updates under MR environments. Eur. J. Radiol. 2017; 89: 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.010

5. Hartwig V, Virgili G, Ferrante Vero LF, et al. Towards a personalised and interactive assessment of occupational exposure to magnetic field during daily routine in magnetic resonance. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2018; 182: 546–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy114

6. Hartwig V., Biagini C., Marchi D. et al. (2020): Analysis, comparison and representation of occupational exposure to a static magnetic field in a 3-T MRI site, Int. J. of Occup. Saf. and Ergon. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2020.1738114

7. Stuart Crozier, Hua Wang, Adnan Trakic, Feng Liu Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007; 26: 1236–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21162

8. Zanotti G., Modenese A., Bravo G., Arcangeli G. et c. Subjective symptoms in magnetic resonance imaging operators: preliminary results of an Italian study. J. of Occup. Environ. Med. 2018; 75 (2): 422-3.

9. Ghadimi-Moghadam A., Mortazavi S. M. J., Hosseini-Moghadam A., Haghani M. et al. Does Exposure to Static Magnetic Fields Generated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners Raise Safety Problems for Personnel? J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2018; 8(3): 333–6.

10. Mokoyan B.O. Hygienic features of the labor of medical personnel working with magnetic resonance imaging. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2012; 3: 34–6 (in Russian).

11. Kazey E.K. Comprehensive hygienic assessment of the working conditions of medical workers employed in magnetic resonance imaging cabinets. Zdorov'ye i okruzhayushchaya sreda. 2013; 23: 29–33 (in Russian).

12. Mamchik N.P., Mokoyan B.O., Kameneva O.V. et al. The health status of medical workers in magnetic resonance imaging cabinets. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2016; 7: 9–13 (in Russian).

13. Egorova A.M., Mokoyan B.O., Lutsenko L.A. Some aspects of identifying health risk factors for medical personnel when working with magnetic resonance imaging. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2017; 2: 34–7 (in Russian).

14. Pokhodzey L.V., Rudneva E.A., Courierov N.N. Actual problems of hygienic assessment of electromagnetic fields and noise in the magnetic resonance imaging departments. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2019; 9: 726–7 (in Russian).

15. ICNIRP. Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys. 2009; 96: 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000343164.27920.4a

16. ICNIRP. Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients. Health. Phys. 2004; 87: 197–216.

17. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by movement of the human body in a static magnetic field and by time-varying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. Health Phys. 2014; 106: 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31829e5580

18. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2009; 97(3): 257–8.

19. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 2010; 99: 818–36.

20. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020; 118(5): 483–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210

21. Pokhodzey L.V., Rudneva E.A., Paltsev Yu.P. Electromagnetic fields hygienic assessment current state in magnetic resonance imaging departments in Russia and abroad. Report at the All-Russian Conference "Actual problems of radiobiology and hygiene of non-ionizing radiation." 12-13.11.2019 (in Russian). http://www.bioemf.ru/conf/conf2/POKHODZEY_LV.pdf

22. Pokhodzey L.V., Rudneva E.A, Paltsev Yu.P. Investigation of the spectral characteristics of low-frequency magnetic fields under various modes of magnetic resonance imaging. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2019 59 (9): 727 (in Russian).

23. Paltsev Yu.P., Pokhodzey L.V., Rubtsova N.B. et al. Improvement and harmonization of hygienic standards for electric and magnetic fields. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2013; 2: 5–8 (in Russian).

24. Paltsev Yu.P., Pokhodzey L.V., Rubtsova N.B. et al. A method for predicting the biological effects of magnetic fields on humans. Patent for invention RUS 2551918 11/26/2013 (in Russian).

25. Batistatou E., Mölter A., Kromhout H. et al. Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI procedures in clinical practice in the UK. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016; 73 (11): 779–786. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103194

26. Sannino A., Romeo S., Scarfì M.R. et al. Exposure Assessment and Biomonitoring of Workers in Magnetic Resonance Environment: An Exploratory Study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2017; 5: Art.344: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00344