Assessment of the volume activity of α-radioactive wastes on surface and specific contamination by portable γ-spectrometry method
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-7-468-473
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the volume activity of radioactive waste (RW) by surface and specific alpha contamination using portable gamma-spectrometry.
Materials and methods. Methods of rapid assessment of the content of α-emitting radionuclides in solid waste of various morphologies using gamma-spectrometers based on germanium detectors are considered. Computational methods for determining the effectiveness of radionuclide registration are presented.
Results. The possibility of using portable gamma-ray spectrometry to assess the surface and specific activity of various materials contaminated with α-emitters (232Th, 235U, 238U, 237Np, 239Pu, 240Pu and 241Am) is shown. The calculated values of the registration efficiency of low-energy gamma-emitters obtained by modeling the spatial-energy parameters of the detector are given.
To simplify the solution of this problem, the calculation program used 20 standard templates of various geometries (rectangular, cylindrical, conical, spherical, etc.). The main sources of error in the survey of contaminated surfaces, largesized equipment and building structures were investigated.
Conclusions. The possibilities of portable γ-spectrometry for estimating the volume of RW based on the surface density of contamination of materials with radionuclides of uranium and transuranic elements are investigated. When using γ-spectrometer with a high-purity germanium detector with a range of γ-quanta extended in the low-energy region, radionuclides such as 232Th, 235U,238U, 237Np, 241Am were determined by their own radiation or by the radiation of their daughter products.
The “problem” element is plutonium, for rapid evaluation of which it is proposed, in accordance with the radionuclide vector methodology, to use 241Am, which accumulates during the β-decay of 241Pu.
According to calculations, the most likely value of the activity ratio 239Pu/241Am for the object where the work was performed (scaling factor) varies in the range from 5.0 to 9.0.
Based on the results of calculations and experimental studies, the parameters of the efficiency of registration of various α-emitting radionuclides by portable γ-spectrometers. It has been found that for germanium detectors with an absolute efficiency of registering a point source of 7÷15%, it is n×10–5÷n×10–4%.
About the Authors
I. P. KorenkovRussian Federation
Igor P. Korenkov, chief researcher, Dr. of Sci. (Biol.), Professor
46, Zhivopisnaya str., Moscow
A. I. Ermakov
Russian Federation
Alexandr I. Ermakov
33/18, Kashirskoye highway, Moscow
A. B. Mayzik
Russian Federation
Alelsey B. Mayzik
5a, Rogova str., Moscow
T. N. Laschenova
Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Laschenova
46, Zhivopisnaya str., Moscow
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198
V. N. Klochkov
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Klochkov
46, Zhivopisnaya str., Moscow
A. Yu. Bushmanov
Russian Federation
Andrey Yu. Bushmanov
46, Zhivopisnaya str., Moscow
References
1. Bylkin B.K., Engatov I.A. Decommissioning of nuclear reactor systems. Moscow, National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”; 2018 (in Russian).
2. Agapov A.N, Abramov A.A., Dyakov S.V. et al. Problems related to nuclear legacy and their solutions. Moscow; 2010, vol. 1. (in Russian).
3. Korenkov I.P., Shandala N.K., Laschenova T.N., Sobolev A.I. Environmental protection at operation and decommissioning of radiationhazardous facilities. Moscow, Binom; 2014 (in Russian).
4. Korenkov I.P., Laschenova T.N., Shandala N.K. Decision-making behavior at decommissioning of radiation-hazardous facilities. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2010; 6: 55–61. (in Russian).
5. Best foreign practices of site decommissioning and remediation. Volumes 1. Ed.: Linge I.I. and Abramov A.A. IBRAE; 2017 (in Russian).
6. Best foreign practices of site decommissioning and remediation. Volumes 2. Ed.: Linge I.I. and Abramov A.A. IBRAE; 2017 (in Russian).
7. Abramov А.А. Final results of implementation of the NRB FTP and challenges for the future. The 15 th anniversary Russian scientific conference. Moscow, IBRAE; 2015: 15–21 (in Russian).
8. Mayzik A.B., Kuznetsov A.Yu., Tsovyanov A.G. et al. Organizational and methodical approaches to decommissioning of radiation-hazardous facilities. ANRI. 2017; 1(88): 55–62 (in Russian).
9. ISO 21238:2007. Nuclear energy — Nuclear fuel technology — Scaling factor method to determine the radioactivity of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste packages generated at nuclear power plants.
10. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NW-T–1.18. Determination and use of scaling factors for waste characterization in NPP. IAEA, Vienna, Austria; 2009.
11. Guidance for safety in the use of nuclear power. Guidelines on using of the radionuclide relations method for determination of the content of hard detectable radionuclides in radioactive wastes of nuclear fuel cycle facilities (RB–154–19). Approved by Rostekhnadzor order No. 137 of 04.04.2019
12. Prudnikov A.P., Brychkov Yu.A., Marichev O.I. Integrals and series. 2 nd edition. Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2003, vol. 1, ISBN 5-9221-0323-7.
Review
For citations:
Korenkov I.P., Ermakov A.I., Mayzik A.B., Laschenova T.N., Klochkov V.N., Bushmanov A.Yu. Assessment of the volume activity of α-radioactive wastes on surface and specific contamination by portable γ-spectrometry method. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2020;(7):468-473. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-7-468-473