Gender differences in biochemical measurement reflecting the state of free-radical oxidation and antioxidant protection among workers in metallurgical production
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-10-877-881
Abstract
Introduction. To date, age and sex differences have been established for many biochemical parameters. Gender differences in indicators for systems such as antioxidant, thiol-disulfide, oxidative stress and inflammation systems are absent or under study.
The aim of the study was to identify gender differences in biochemical parameters reflecting the functioning of antioxidant systems of the body and free radical oxidation in workers of metallurgical production, in contact with harmful production factors.
Materials and methods. The blood of men and women working at the metallurgical enterprise of the Nizhny Novgorod region (n=80) under the influence of a complex of physical and chemical production factors was studied. Total oxidative stress, total antioxidant capacity of serum, glutathione levels were studied by photometric biochemical methods. Levels of C-reactive protein and 8-hydroxy–2-deoxyguanosine were studied by ELISA.
Results. The average amount of peroxides in the serum of women exceeded 1.6 times this figure in men. In the group of men, the content of 8-Ondg was higher by 26% (p=0.012), the level of GS-by 12% (p=0.019), the activity of SOD — by 1.5–2 times (p=0.0001), the level of CRP — by 2 times (p=0.008) compared to similar indicators in women.
Conclusions. Studies of gender differences in workers under the influence of harmful production factors will allow more effective approach to the etiology, treatment and prognosis of production-related diseases. Indicators of oxidative stress and antioxidant protection can be indicators of the health of workers under the influence of harmful industrial factors and be important in the prevention of diseases associated with oxidative stress.
About the Authors
I. A. UmnyaginaRussian Federation
Irina A. Umnyagina, Director
Cand. of Sci. (Med.) E-mail: recept@niigp.ru
L. A. Strakhova
Russian Federation
T. V. Blinova
Russian Federation
References
1. Perepechko V.P., Aristarkhova O.Yu., Zayratyants O.V., Vertkin A.L., Dzivina M.I., Adonina Ye.V. Age, sex and genderspecifi c diff erences in the course of socially significant diseases. Emergency doctor. 2011; 3: 7–15 (in Russian).
2. Baett a R., Pontremoli M., Fernandez A.M., Spickett C.M., Banfi C. Reprint of: Proteomics in cardiovascular diseases: Unveiling sex and gender differences in the era of precision medicine. J Proteomics. 2018 Apr 30; 178: 57–72. DOI: 10.1016/j. jprot.2018.03.017.
3. Shufelt C.L., Pacheco C., Tweet M.S., Miller V.M. SexSpecifi c physiology and cardiovascular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1065: 433–54. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–319–77932–4_27.
4. Comşa H.I, Zdrenghea D., Man S.C., Pop D. Th e role of novel atherosclerosis markers in peripheral artery disease: is there a gender diff erence? Cardiovasc J Afr . 2018 Sep/Oct 23; 29 (5): 322–30. DOI: 10.5830/CVJA–2018–023
5. Belenkov Yu.N., Fomin I.V., Badin Yu.V., Polyakov D.S., Mareyev V.Yu., Ageyev F.T. Gender diff erences in the prevalence and eff ectiveness of treatment of arterial hypertension in the European part of the Russian Federation: results of the Epidemiological survey of patients in the European part of Russia (EPOKHA–2007) of 2007. Women’s health issues. 2011; 6 (4): 6–11 (in Russian).
6. Carrero J.J., Hecking M., Chesnaye N.C., Jager K.J. Половые и гендерные различия в эпидемиологии и исходах хронического заболевания почек. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018; 14 (3): 151–64. DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.181.
7. Hipwell A.E., Kahn L.G., Factor-Litvak P., Porucznik C.A., Siegel E.L., Fichorova R.N. et al. Exposure to non-persistent chemicals in consumer products and fecundability: a systematic review. Рrogram collaborators for Environmental infl uences on Child Health Outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Jan 1; 25 (1): 51–71. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy032.
8. Pacharra M., Kleinbeck S, Schäper M, Juran S.A., Hey K., Blaszkewicz M. et al. Interindividual diff erences in chemosensory perception: Toward a bett er understanding of perceptual ratings during chemical exposures. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2016; 79 (22–23): 1026–40.
9. Howe C.G., Liu X., Hall M.N., Ilievski V., Caudill M.A., Malysheva O. Sex-Specific associations between one-carbon metabolism indices and postt ranslational histone modifi cations in arsenic-exposed bangladeshi adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Feb; 26 (2): 261–9. DOI: 10.1158/1055–9965.
10. Kostyuk I.F., Byazrova V.V., Steblina N.P., Prokhorenko V.L. Gender features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of dust etiology. Problems of environmental and medical genetics and clinical immunology. 2012; 5: 565–71 (in Russian).
11. Kishkun A.A. Guide to laboratory diagnostic methods. Moscow. “GEOTAR-Media”; 2009 (in Russian)
12. Giustarini, D., Fanti, P., Sparatore, A., Matt eucci, E., Rossi R. Anethole dithiolethione lowers the homocysteine and raises the glutathone levels in solid tissues and plasma of rats: a novel nonvitamin homocysteine-lowering agent. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014; 89: 246–54. DOI: 10.1016/j. bcp. 2014.03.005.
13. Puertas M.C., Martínez-Martos J.M., Cobo M.P., Carrera M.P., Mayas M.D., Ramírez-Expósito M.J. Plasma oxidative stress parameters in men and women with early stage Alzheimer type dementia. Exp Gerontol. 2012 Aug; 47 (8): 625–30. DOI: 10.1016/j. exger.2012.05.019.
14. Topic A., Malic Z., Francuski D., Stankovic M., Markovic B., Soskic B. Gender-related diff erences in susceptibility to oxidative stress in healthy middle-aged Serbian adults. Biomarkers. 2016; 21 (2): 186–93. DOI: 10.3109/1354750X.2015.1126647.
15. Brunelli E., Domanico F., La Russa D., Pellegrino D. Sex diff erences in oxidative stress biomarkers. Curr Drug Targets. 2014; 15 (8): 811–5.
Review
For citations:
Umnyagina I.A., Strakhova L.A., Blinova T.V. Gender differences in biochemical measurement reflecting the state of free-radical oxidation and antioxidant protection among workers in metallurgical production. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2019;1(10):877-881. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-10-877-881