Air regime and assessment of working environment factors in precision processing of non-ferrous metal components
https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-5-49-53
Abstract
Technical modernization of production requires hygienic evaluation of occupational factors at workplaces of coldpressing equipment adjusters, with the equipment evaluation. Production of memorable, jubilee coins and badges requires hi-tech equipment and special attention to the output products quality. The authors assessed air enviornment and occupational environmental factors in coining of non-ferrous articles at workplaces using cold-pressing equipment. Increased concentrations of mineral oils could result in damages of working surface processed and deteriorate the output article quality. Electrostatic field increases the surface damage effect due to absorption of dust particles from ambient air. The recommendations specifi ed enabled to increase quality of the output articles due to removing dust from the air feed and lower accumulation of electrostatic charge on the working surface, reliable grounding of devices.
About the Authors
O. L. MarkovaRussian Federation
4, 2nd Sovetskaya str., St. Petersburg, 191036
E. V. Ivanova
Russian Federation
4, 2nd Sovetskaya str., St. Petersburg, 191036
V. P. Plekhanov
Russian Federation
4, 2nd Sovetskaya str., St. Petersburg, 191036
References
1. Markova O.L., Ivanova E.V. Contemporary solutions for better air environment at welders’ workplace // Med. truda i prom. ekolog. — 2015. — 2. — Р. 5–8 (in Russian).
2. Method of measuring mass concentrations of metals in ambient air via atomic absorption with electrothermic atomization by atomic absorption spectrometer MGA –915. FR. 1.31.2005.01685: — St-Petersburg: OOO «Lyumeks», 2005. — 21 р. (in Russian).
3. Method of measuring mass concentrations of metals (aluminium, barium, beryllium, vanadium, bismuth, wolframium, ferrum, cadmium, potassium, calcium, cobalt, magnesium, manganese, copper, molybdenium, sodium, nickel, stannum, mercury, lead, antimony, titanium, chromium, zinc) and silicon, arsenic and selenium in industrial waste into atmosphere and in air of workplace via atomic absorption and atomic emission methods. MI-EAL. 02–2011: — St-Petersburg: OOO «EAL CSPO», 2011. — 44 р. (in Russian).
4. Maximally allowable concentrations (MAC) of chemical hazards in air or workplace. GN 2.2.5.1313–03. — Moscow: Minzdrav Rossii, 2003. — 268 р. (in Russian).
5. Maximally allowable concentrations (MAC) for pollutants in ambient air of rural and urban sett lements. GN 2.1.6.3492– 17. — Moscow: Minzdrav Rossii, 2018. — 35 р. (in Russian).
6. Manual on hygienic evaluation of working environment and working process factors. Criteria and classifi cation of work conditions. Manual 2.2.2006–05. — St-Petersburg: COTPBSPPO, 2005. — 144 р. (in Russian).
7. Manual on control of atmosphere pollution. RD 52.04.186– 89: Rukovodyashij dokument. — M.: Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya SSSR, 1991. — 695 р. (in Russian).
8. SP 60.13330.2012 Heating, ventilation and conditioning. Actual edition of SNiP 41–01–2003 (in Russian)
9. R. Neitzel, B. Fligor. Determination of Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss due to Recreational Sound: Review. World Health Organization. Feb 2017.
Review
For citations:
Markova O.L., Ivanova E.V., Plekhanov V.P. Air regime and assessment of working environment factors in precision processing of non-ferrous metal components. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2018;(5):49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2018-5-49-53