zurniimtpeМедицина труда и промышленная экологияRussian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology1026-94282618-8945FSBSI “Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health”zurniimtpe-4174Research ArticleРЕПРИНТЫREPRINTSОбзор как перспективный вид научной публикации, его типы и характеристикиReviews as a promising kind of scholarly publication, its types and characteristicshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-6090РаицкаяЛилия КлиментовнаRaitskayaLilia K.

Доктор педагогических наук, доцент, кандидат экономических наук, профессор кафедры педагогики и психологии, советник ректора, Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации, г. Москва, Российская Федерация

e-mail: L.Raitskaya@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associated Professor, Professor of the Chair of Pedagogy and Psychology, Rector’s Advisor, Moscow Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russian Federation

e-mail: L.Raitskaya@mail.ru

L.Raitskaya@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-6150ТихоноваЕлена ВикторовнаTikhonovaElena V.

Кандидат исторических наук, доцент, заведующий редакцией международного научного журнала Journal of Language and Education, Российский университет дружбы народов, г. Москва, Российская Федерация; Российская академия образования, г. Москва, Российская Федерация

e-mail: etihonova@gmail.com

Cand. Sci. (History), Associated Professor, Head of the Editorial Office of the Journal of Language and Education, RUND University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russian Federation

e-mail: etihonova@gmail.com

etihonova@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) Министерства иностранных дел Российской ФедерацииРоссияMoscow Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)Russian FederationРоссийский университет дружбы народов, г. Москва, Российская Федерация; Российская академия образованияРоссияRUND University; Russian Academy of EducationRussian Federation202602062026664282288Copyright © Раицкая Л.К., Тихонова Е.В., 20262026Раицкая Л.К., Тихонова Е.В.Raitskaya L.K., Tikhonova E.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.journal-irioh.ru/jour/article/view/4174

Обзоры, публикуемые в медицинских журналах и интегрирующие новации в доказательной медицине, в условиях беспрецедентного роста объёмов научной информации становятся востребованной формой публикации в социогуманитарных и других науках. Обзоры упорядочивают новую информацию, критически переосмысливают вклад новых публикаций в науку, определяют тенденции исследований в предметных областях и выявляют пробелы в знаниях. В статье сравнительно ограниченный опыт российских учёных в подготовке обзоров сопоставляется с передовыми международными традициями; выделяются основные рекомендации по подготовке обзоров на уровне мировых стандартов; анализируются функции, характеристики, таксономия и методология обзоров как перспективного вида научных публикаций для российской науки. Авторы рассматривают критерии, формирующие обширную типологию обзоров, а также особенности методологии самых популярных и перспективных видов обзоров (систематического обзора, обзора предметного поля, библиометрического обзора и др.) по различным областям научного знания.

Reviews have been published for years in medical journals as integrators of new data in evidencebased medicine. This type of publication is finding its way into social sciences, humanities and other areas, getting popularity in the global context of the unprecedented rise in scholarly information. Reviews arrange and streamline the inflow of information, critically reflect on the new research contributions to science, outline the focus trends in subject areas and define gaps in the knowledge. Comparatively limited expertise of Russian researchers in authoring reviews is analysed against the advanced international traditions coupled with some practical guidelines relating to internationally published high-quality reviews. The article considers functions, characteristics, taxonomy and methodologies of reviews as a highly potential type of scientific publication for science in Russia. The authors also touch upon criteria for taxonomy resulting in multiple types of reviews and specific features of methods of the most popular and widely spread reviews (systematic reviews, scoping reviews, bibliometric reviews, etc.) in various fields and disciplines.

научная публикацияобзор литературысистематический обзоробзор предметного полябиблиометрический обзортеоретический обзорописательный обзорнарративный обзорreviewsystematic reviewscoping reviewbibliometric reviewtheoretical reviewdescriptive reviewnarrative reviewReferencesAzer S.A. The Top-Cited Articles in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Academic Medicine. 2015; 90(8): 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780Azer S.A. The Top-Cited Articles in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Academic Medicine. 2015; 90(8): 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780Renck Jalongo M., Saracho O.N. Writing for Publication: Transitions and Tools that Support Scholars’ success. Springer; 2016.Renck Jalongo M., Saracho O.N. Writing for Publication: Transitions and Tools that Support Scholars’ success. Springer; 2016.Grant M., Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848Grant M., Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848Torres J.T., Higheagle Strong Z., Adesope O.O. Reflection through assessment: A systematic narrative review of teacher feedback and student self-perception. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2020; 64: 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. stueduc.2019.100814Torres J.T., Higheagle Strong Z., Adesope O.O. Reflection through assessment: A systematic narrative review of teacher feedback and student self-perception. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2020; 64: 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. stueduc.2019.100814Topoglu Y., Watson J., Suri R., Ayaz H. Electrodermal activity in ambulatory settings: a narrative review of literature. In: Ayaz H. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 953. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_10Topoglu Y., Watson J., Suri R., Ayaz H. Electrodermal activity in ambulatory settings: a narrative review of literature. In: Ayaz H. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 953. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_10Kragt D., Holtrop D. Volunteering research in Australia: A narrative review. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2019; 71(4): 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12251Kragt D., Holtrop D. Volunteering research in Australia: A narrative review. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2019; 71(4): 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12251Durojaye O., Laseinde T., Oluwafemi I. A Descriptive Review of Carbon Footprint. In: Ahram T., Karwowski W., Pickl S., Taiar R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1026. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_144Durojaye O., Laseinde T., Oluwafemi I. A Descriptive Review of Carbon Footprint. In: Ahram T., Karwowski W., Pickl S., Taiar R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1026. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_144Muggah R. Negotiating disarmament and demobilisation: A descriptive review of the evidence. Colombia International. 2013; 77: 21–41. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rci/n77/n77a02.pdfMuggah R. Negotiating disarmament and demobilisation: A descriptive review of the evidence. Colombia International. 2013; 77: 21–41. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rci/n77/n77a02.pdfZhu J.-H. Public opinion polling in China: A descriptive review. Gazette. 1988; 41(2): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928804100204Zhu J.-H. Public opinion polling in China: A descriptive review. Gazette. 1988; 41(2): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928804100204Blass A.P., Gouvea da Costa S.E. Pinheiro de Lima E., Tortato U., Borges L.A. Environmental Performance Measurement in Hospitals: A Bibliometric Review of Literature (1987–2017). In: Leal Filho W., Tortato U., Franken-berger F. (eds) Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8 8Blass A.P., Gouvea da Costa S.E. Pinheiro de Lima E., Tortato U., Borges L.A. Environmental Performance Measurement in Hospitals: A Bibliometric Review of Literature (1987–2017). In: Leal Filho W., Tortato U., Franken-berger F. (eds) Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham; 2020, pp. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8 8Duran-Sanchez A., Alvarez Garcia J., Del Rio-Rama M.C., Ratten V. Trends and changes in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2019; 25(7): 1494–1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2019-0249Duran-Sanchez A., Alvarez Garcia J., Del Rio-Rama M.C., Ratten V. Trends and changes in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2019; 25(7): 1494–1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2019-0249Grosseck G., Tiru L.G., Bran R.A. Education for sustainable development: Evolution and perspectives: A bibliometric review of research, 1992–2018. Sustainability. 2019; 11(21): 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136Grosseck G., Tiru L.G., Bran R.A. Education for sustainable development: Evolution and perspectives: A bibliometric review of research, 1992–2018. Sustainability. 2019; 11(21): 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136Sant E. Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research. 2019; 89(5): 655–696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493Sant E. Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research. 2019; 89(5): 655–696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493Bostrom M., Andersson E., Berg M., Gustafsson K., Gustavsson E., Hysing E., et al. Conditions for transformative learning for sustainable development: A theoretical review and approach. Sustainability. 2018; 10(12): 4479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124479Bostrom M., Andersson E., Berg M., Gustafsson K., Gustavsson E., Hysing E., et al. Conditions for transformative learning for sustainable development: A theoretical review and approach. Sustainability. 2018; 10(12): 4479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124479Smith R., Killgore W.D.S., Lane R.D. The structure of emotional experience and its relation to trait emotional awareness: A theoretical review. Emotion. 2018; 18(5): 670–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000376Smith R., Killgore W.D.S., Lane R.D. The structure of emotional experience and its relation to trait emotional awareness: A theoretical review. Emotion. 2018; 18(5): 670–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000376Lepage R., Glass S. V., Knowles W., Mukhopadhyaya P. Biodeterioration Models for Building Materials: Critical Review. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2019; 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000366Lepage R., Glass S. V., Knowles W., Mukhopadhyaya P. Biodeterioration Models for Building Materials: Critical Review. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2019; 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000366Barnes S., Bloch S. Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2019; 33(3): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541Barnes S., Bloch S. Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2019; 33(3): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541Lai P.-С. Chinese explorations of orthodox theology: A critical review. International journal for the Study of the Christian Church. 2018; 14: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2018.1549212Lai P.-С. Chinese explorations of orthodox theology: A critical review. International journal for the Study of the Christian Church. 2018; 14: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2018.1549212Buse C.G., Sax M., Nowak N. et al. Locating community impacts of unconventional natural gas across the supply chain: A scoping review. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2019; 6(2): 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.03.002Buse C.G., Sax M., Nowak N. et al. Locating community impacts of unconventional natural gas across the supply chain: A scoping review. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2019; 6(2): 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.03.002Doosty F., Maleki M., Yarmohammadian M. An investigation on workload indicator of staffing need: A scoping review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2019; 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_220_18Doosty F., Maleki M., Yarmohammadian M. An investigation on workload indicator of staffing need: A scoping review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2019; 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_220_18Lee C.A., Pais K., Kelling S., Anderson O.S. A scoping review to understand simulation used in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2018; 13: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. xjep.2018.08.003Lee C.A., Pais K., Kelling S., Anderson O.S. A scoping review to understand simulation used in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2018; 13: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. xjep.2018.08.003Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2005; 8(1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2005; 8(1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616Mucci N., Traversini V., Giorgi G., Garzaro G., Fiz-Perez J., Campagna M. et al. Migrant Workers and physical health: An umbrella review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(1): 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010232Mucci N., Traversini V., Giorgi G., Garzaro G., Fiz-Perez J., Campagna M. et al. Migrant Workers and physical health: An umbrella review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(1): 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010232Onyura B., Baker L. et al. Evidence for curricular and instructional design approaches in undergraduate medical education: An umbrella review. Medical Teacher. 2016; 38(2): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009019Onyura B., Baker L. et al. Evidence for curricular and instructional design approaches in undergraduate medical education: An umbrella review. Medical Teacher. 2016; 38(2): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009019Mbemba G., Gagnon M.-P., Pare G., Cote J. Interventions for supporting nurse retention in rural and remote areas: An umbrella review. Human Resources for Health. 2013; 11: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-44Mbemba G., Gagnon M.-P., Pare G., Cote J. Interventions for supporting nurse retention in rural and remote areas: An umbrella review. Human Resources for Health. 2013; 11: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-44Biondi-Zoccai G. (ed.) Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies. Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9Biondi-Zoccai G. (ed.) Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies. Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9Paterson C., Paterson N., Jackson W., Work F. What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today. 2020; 85: 104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236Paterson C., Paterson N., Jackson W., Work F. What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today. 2020; 85: 104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236Amor A.M., Hagiwara M., Shogren K.A., Thompson J.R., Verdugo M.A., Burke K.M. et al. International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: a systematic review. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2019; 23(12): 1277–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1445304Amor A.M., Hagiwara M., Shogren K.A., Thompson J.R., Verdugo M.A., Burke K.M. et al. International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: a systematic review. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2019; 23(12): 1277–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1445304Tortella-Feliu M., Fullana M.A., Perez-Vigil A., Torres X., Chamorro J., Littarelli S.A. et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobe-havioralReviews. 2019; 107: 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.013Tortella-Feliu M., Fullana M.A., Perez-Vigil A., Torres X., Chamorro J., Littarelli S.A. et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobe-havioralReviews. 2019; 107: 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.013Burgers C., Brugman B. C., Boeynaems A. Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Pragmatics. 2019; 145: 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.004Burgers C., Brugman B. C., Boeynaems A. Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Pragmatics. 2019; 145: 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.004Raitskaya L., Tikhonova E. Scoping Reviews: What is in a Name? Journal of Language and Education. 2019; 5(2): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9689Raitskaya L., Tikhonova E. Scoping Reviews: What is in a Name? Journal of Language and Education. 2019; 5(2): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9689Yeganeh A.J., McCoy A.P., Schenk T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis. Urban Climate. 2020; 31: 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100547Yeganeh A.J., McCoy A.P., Schenk T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis. Urban Climate. 2020; 31: 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100547van Alten D.C.D., Phielix C., Janssen J., Kester L. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2019; 28: 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003van Alten D.C.D., Phielix C., Janssen J., Kester L. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2019; 28: 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003Kouba K., Lysek J. What Affects Invalid Voting? A Review and Meta-Analysis. Government and Opposition. 2019; 54(4): 745–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.33Kouba K., Lysek J. What Affects Invalid Voting? A Review and Meta-Analysis. Government and Opposition. 2019; 54(4): 745–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.33Moher D. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Me-ta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoSMed. 2009; 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Moher D. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Me-ta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoSMed. 2009; 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.